2004Journal of American HistoryRequires access

Untitled research work

Daniel P. Barr

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This brief documentary is derived from the book King Philip's War: The History and Legacy of America's Forgotten Conflict (1999), by Eric Schultz and Michael Tougias. The book, which has earned regional accolades as a tourist's guide to sites and locations important in King Philip's War, has garnered little scholarly attention outside of New England and does not fare well when compared to studies by James Drake, Jill Lepore, and Russell Bourne. As the video's script is an abridgment of the book written by the authors themselves, it suffers from the same shortcomings. There is no discernable argument driving the presentation. The film instead comes across as a timeline account of battles and raids with little interlinking interpretation. To be fair, the historical talking heads, who include both authors as well as staff members of Plimoth Plantation and Native American consultants, offer assessment (Nancy Eldridge is particularly good), but their contribution is not enough to rescue the film from its uninspiring march through chronology. Moreover, important historical considerations, including Philip's efforts to resolve the dispute in court and the strategically important entry of the Mohawks into the war, are absent from the narration and discussion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This brief documentary is derived from the book King Philip's War: The History and Legacy of America's Forgotten Conflict (1999), by Eric Schultz and Michael Tougias. The book, which has earned regional accolades as a tourist's guide to sites and locations important in King Philip's War, has garnered little scholarly attention outside of New England and does not fare well when compared to studies by James Drake, Jill Lepore, and Russell Bourne. As the video's script is an abridgment of the book written by the authors themselves, it suffers from the same shortcomings. There is no discernable argument driving the presentation. The film instead comes across as a timeline account of battles and raids with little interlinking interpretation. To be fair, the historical talking heads, who include both authors as well as staff members of Plimoth Plantation and Native American consultants, offer assessment (Nancy Eldridge is particularly good), but their contribution is not enough to rescue the film from its uninspiring march through chronology. Moreover, important historical considerations, including Philip's efforts to resolve the dispute in court and the strategically important entry of the Mohawks into the war, are absent from the narration and discussion.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This brief documentary is derived from the book King Philip's War: The History and Legacy of America's Forgotten Conflict (1999), by Eric Schultz and Michael Tougias. The book, which has earned regional accolades as a tourist's guide to sites and locations important in King Philip's War, has garnered little scholarly attention outside of New England and does not fare well when compared to studies by James Drake, Jill Lepore, and Russell Bourne. As the video's script is an abridgment of the book written by the authors themselves, it suffers from the same shortcomings. There is no discernable argument driving the presentation. The film instead comes across as a timeline account of battles and raids with little interlinking interpretation. To be fair, the historical talking heads, who include both authors as well as staff members of Plimoth Plantation and Native American consultants, offer assessment (Nancy Eldridge is particularly good), but their contribution is not enough to rescue the film from its uninspiring march through chronology. Moreover, important historical considerations, including Philip's efforts to resolve the dispute in court and the strategically important entry of the Mohawks into the war, are absent from the narration and discussion.

Key concepts: Mathematics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Untitled research work — Research Paper | ScholarLens