1986•PubMedRequires access

[Early changes in ventricular function in diastolic phase in the resting coronary patient].

Francesco Cucchini, A Barilli, Roberto Bolognesi, Leonida Compostella, R De Domenico, Antonio Javernaro, Domenico Papalia, Roberto Zeppellini, Paolo Cardaioli

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study is to test left ventricular diastolic function in coronary artery disease patients with preserved systolic performance. Two groups of patients (25 coronary artery disease patients with angiographic proved coronary artery stenosis, but with normal hemodynamic and angiographic indices of systolic phase, first group; and 14 normal subjects for control, second group) were tested comparing their systolic and diastolic ventricular function indices, obtained by using a Millar microtip catheter and a computerized program. Systolic ventricular function was similar in the two groups (EF: 0.61 +/- 0.05 vs 0.62 +/- 0.03, p: n.s.; Vmax:120 +/- 28 vs 112 +/- 24 sec-1, p: n.s.), while diastolic indices were significantly different (lowest diastolic pressure: 3.7 +/- 2.4 vs -1.72 +/- 1.45 mmHg, p less than 0.01; end-diastolic pressure: 11.2 +/- 4.2 vs 6.5 +/- 2.8 mmHg, p less than 0.05; T constant: 45 +/- 8 vs 35 +/- 6 mmHg, p less than 0.001; end-diastolic compliance: 2.79 +/- 0.3 X 10(-2) vs 5.68 +/- 0.4 X 10(-2) mmHg-1, p less than 0.001; Kp: 0.041 +/- 0.006 vs 0.003 +/- 0.004 p less than 0.001). In conclusion, impairment of left ventricular diastolic phase may be one of the earliest manifestations of functional alterations of ischemic ventricle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study is to test left ventricular diastolic function in coronary artery disease patients with preserved systolic performance. Two groups of patients (25 coronary artery disease patients with angiographic proved coronary artery stenosis, but with normal hemodynamic and angiographic indices of systolic phase, first group; and 14 normal subjects for control, second group) were tested comparing their systolic and diastolic ventricular function indices, obtained by using a Millar microtip catheter and a computerized program. Systolic ventricular function was similar in the two groups (EF: 0.61 +/- 0.05 vs 0.62 +/- 0.03, p: n.s.; Vmax:120 +/- 28 vs 112 +/- 24 sec-1, p: n.s.), while diastolic indices were significantly different (lowest diastolic pressure: 3.7 +/- 2.4 vs -1.72 +/- 1.45 mmHg, p less than 0.01; end-diastolic pressure: 11.2 +/- 4.2 vs 6.5 +/- 2.8 mmHg, p less than 0.05; T constant: 45 +/- 8 vs 35 +/- 6 mmHg, p less than 0.001; end-diastolic compliance: 2.79 +/- 0.3 X 10(-2) vs 5.68 +/- 0.4 X 10(-2) mmHg-1, p less than 0.001; Kp: 0.041 +/- 0.006 vs 0.003 +/- 0.004 p less than 0.001). In conclusion, impairment of left ventricular diastolic phase may be one of the earliest manifestations of functional alterations of ischemic ventricle.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study is to test left ventricular diastolic function in coronary artery disease patients with preserved systolic performance. Two groups of patients (25 coronary artery disease patients with angiographic proved coronary artery stenosis, but with normal hemodynamic and angiographic indices of systolic phase, first group; and 14 normal subjects for control, second group) were tested comparing their systolic and diastolic ventricular function indices, obtained by using a Millar microtip catheter and a computerized program. Systolic ventricular function was similar in the two groups (EF: 0.61 +/- 0.05 vs 0.62 +/- 0.03, p: n.s.; Vmax:120 +/- 28 vs 112 +/- 24 sec-1, p: n.s.), while diastolic indices were significantly different (lowest diastolic pressure: 3.7 +/- 2.4 vs -1.72 +/- 1.45 mmHg, p less than 0.01; end-diastolic pressure: 11.2 +/- 4.2 vs 6.5 +/- 2.8 mmHg, p less than 0.05; T constant: 45 +/- 8 vs 35 +/- 6 mmHg, p less than 0.001; end-diastolic compliance: 2.79 +/- 0.3 X 10(-2) vs 5.68 +/- 0.4 X 10(-2) mmHg-1, p less than 0.001; Kp: 0.041 +/- 0.006 vs 0.003 +/- 0.004 p less than 0.001). In conclusion, impairment of left ventricular diastolic phase may be one of the earliest manifestations of functional alterations of ischemic ventricle.

Key concepts: Medicine, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Diastole, Ventricle, Coronary artery disease, Diastolic function, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Early changes in ventricular function in diastolic phase in the resting coronary patient]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens