ScholarLens Back to search
2016•Neurological ResearchRequires access

Evaluation of artificial nerve conduit and autografts in peripheral nerve repair in the rat model of sciatic nerve injury

Rongbo Wu, Li Wang, Fangyi Chen, Yongmei Huang, Jimin Shi, Xingfei Zhu, Yue Ding, Xinchao Zhang

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effect of artificial nerve conduit in the sciatic nerve injury and repair in the rat model. METHODS: A total of 60 adult male Sprague Dawley rats were evenly randomized into five groups to build the model of sciatic nerve injury and perform the injury repair experiment. The five groups were: group A which was treated with artificial nerve conduit, group B which was treated with common carotid artery (CCA) autograft, group C which was treated with sciatic nerve autograft, group D which was treated with sham operation, and group E as the normal control. The injury was repaired by direct coaptation of the nerve ends. Postoperatively, the rats' behavior, motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), incubation period, amplitude, remaining rate of wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle, the diameter and section area of the gastrocnemius cell, and the histological changes were assessed. The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Twelve days postoperatively, 36 rats in groups A, B, and C presented with denervated adermotrophia on the injured ankle. The electrophysiological indicators in groups D and E were constant and similar. The values of MNCV and amplitude were group C > group A > group B, with an increasing tendency. The values of the incubation period were group C < group A < group B with statistical difference (p < 0.05) and showed a decreasing tendency. The wet gastrocnemius muscle in groups D and E showed plump morphology with luster and elasticity. Groups A and C had similar atrophic gastrocnemius muscles and reduced flexibility while the phenomena were more severe in group B. Progressive decrease of the cell diameter and sectional area was observed in groups A, B, and C. The adhesion between the sciatic nerve and the surrounding area in groups A, B, and C had statistical significance (P < 0.05), with group B the most serious. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that artificial nerve conduit facilitated functional and morphological regeneration of the nerve. It seemed more effective than CCA but inferior to sciatic nerve autograft in repairing sciatic nerve injury in the rat model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effect of artificial nerve conduit in the sciatic nerve injury and repair in the rat model. METHODS: A total of 60 adult male Sprague Dawley rats were evenly randomized into five groups to build the model of sciatic nerve injury and perform the injury repair experiment. The five groups were: group A which was treated with artificial nerve conduit, group B which was treated with common carotid artery (CCA) autograft, group C which was treated with sciatic nerve autograft, group D which was treated with sham operation, and group E as the normal control. The injury was repaired by direct coaptation of the nerve ends. Postoperatively, the rats' behavior, motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), incubation period, amplitude, remaining rate of wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle, the diameter and section area of the gastrocnemius cell, and the histological changes were assessed. The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Twelve days postoperatively, 36 rats in groups A, B, and C presented with denervated adermotrophia on the injured ankle. The electrophysiological indicators in groups D and E were constant and similar. The values of MNCV and amplitude were group C > group A > group B, with an increasing tendency. The values of the incubation period were group C < group A < group B with statistical difference (p < 0.05) and showed a decreasing tendency. The wet gastrocnemius muscle in groups D and E showed plump morphology with luster and elasticity. Groups A and C had similar atrophic gastrocnemius muscles and reduced flexibility while the phenomena were more severe in group B. Progressive decrease of the cell diameter and sectional area was observed in groups A, B, and C. The adhesion between the sciatic nerve and the surrounding area in groups A, B, and C had statistical significance (P < 0.05), with group B the most serious. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that artificial nerve conduit facilitated functional and morphological regeneration of the nerve. It seemed more effective than CCA but inferior to sciatic nerve autograft in repairing sciatic nerve injury in the rat model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effect of artificial nerve conduit in the sciatic nerve injury and repair in the rat model. METHODS: A total of 60 adult male Sprague Dawley rats were evenly randomized into five groups to build the model of sciatic nerve injury and perform the injury repair experiment. The five groups were: group A which was treated with artificial nerve conduit, group B which was treated with common carotid artery (CCA) autograft, group C which was treated with sciatic nerve autograft, group D which was treated with sham operation, and group E as the normal control. The injury was repaired by direct coaptation of the nerve ends. Postoperatively, the rats' behavior, motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), incubation period, amplitude, remaining rate of wet weight of the gastrocnemius muscle, the diameter and section area of the gastrocnemius cell, and the histological changes were assessed. The results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Twelve days postoperatively, 36 rats in groups A, B, and C presented with denervated adermotrophia on the injured ankle. The electrophysiological indicators in groups D and E were constant and similar. The values of MNCV and amplitude were group C > group A > group B, with an increasing tendency. The values of the incubation period were group C < group A < group B with statistical difference (p < 0.05) and showed a decreasing tendency. The wet gastrocnemius muscle in groups D and E showed plump morphology with luster and elasticity. Groups A and C had similar atrophic gastrocnemius muscles and reduced flexibility while the phenomena were more severe in group B. Progressive decrease of the cell diameter and sectional area was observed in groups A, B, and C. The adhesion between the sciatic nerve and the surrounding area in groups A, B, and C had statistical significance (P < 0.05), with group B the most serious. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that artificial nerve conduit facilitated functional and morphological regeneration of the nerve. It seemed more effective than CCA but inferior to sciatic nerve autograft in repairing sciatic nerve injury in the rat model.

Key concepts: Sciatic nerve, Gastrocnemius muscle, Medicine, Peripheral nerve injury, Ankle, Analysis of variance, Sciatic nerve injury, Nerve injury

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of artificial nerve conduit and autografts in peripheral nerve repair in the rat model of sciatic nerve injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens