2012•Grow: Plant Health ExchangeRequires access

Methyl Bromide Alternatives

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Methyl bromide (MeBr) is the fumigant of choice for almost all commercial and quarantine fumigations for disinfestation. Since 1992, it is regulated as a significant ozone depleting substance and it is phased out since 2005 with several exemptions like quarantine and preshipment, critical uses and article 5 countries. The main characteristics of MeBr are excellent effectiveness on insects, mites and nematodes, whatever the temperature if it is above 5°C. The exposure time is between 2 to 24 h, and the dosage changes with the temperature. As direct alternatives, only two fumigants remain, phosphine for all stored products and sulfuryl fluoride (SF) for some stored products and structural fumigations. For commercial fumigations, there are two ways to find alternatives: keep the same technique with a curative disinfestation or change completely the way of the treatment. The same (in-kind) techniques are fumigants, included phosphine gas, controlled atmospheres including high pressure CO2, and also contact insecticides, heat and cold, irradiation and some other techniques. The other way is to completely change the production, for example by introducing a better IPM. For quarantine fumigations, it is much more complicated because all the standards used for disinfestation come from lot of studies carried out in many countries, often long ago, giving international rules, based on the probit 9 (99.9968% efficacy). The change to another curative disinfestation like heat, cold or other fumigants needs new studies to prove the quarantine efficacy which means money and time. Systems approaches capitalise on cumulative pest mortality from multiple control components to achieve quarantine security in an exported commodity. In conclusion, many techniques exist for commercial and quarantine MeBr fumigations but they require changes in habits and many times have economic implications. Nevertheless, the ban of MeBr is a fantastic opportunity to find new ways from old or new techniques.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Methyl bromide (MeBr) is the fumigant of choice for almost all commercial and quarantine fumigations for disinfestation. Since 1992, it is regulated as a significant ozone depleting substance and it is phased out since 2005 with several exemptions like quarantine and preshipment, critical uses and article 5 countries. The main characteristics of MeBr are excellent effectiveness on insects, mites and nematodes, whatever the temperature if it is above 5°C. The exposure time is between 2 to 24 h, and the dosage changes with the temperature. As direct alternatives, only two fumigants remain, phosphine for all stored products and sulfuryl fluoride (SF) for some stored products and structural fumigations. For commercial fumigations, there are two ways to find alternatives: keep the same technique with a curative disinfestation or change completely the way of the treatment. The same (in-kind) techniques are fumigants, included phosphine gas, controlled atmospheres including high pressure CO2, and also contact insecticides, heat and cold, irradiation and some other techniques. The other way is to completely change the production, for example by introducing a better IPM. For quarantine fumigations, it is much more complicated because all the standards used for disinfestation come from lot of studies carried out in many countries, often long ago, giving international rules, based on the probit 9 (99.9968% efficacy). The change to another curative disinfestation like heat, cold or other fumigants needs new studies to prove the quarantine efficacy which means money and time. Systems approaches capitalise on cumulative pest mortality from multiple control components to achieve quarantine security in an exported commodity. In conclusion, many techniques exist for commercial and quarantine MeBr fumigations but they require changes in habits and many times have economic implications. Nevertheless, the ban of MeBr is a fantastic opportunity to find new ways from old or new techniques.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Methyl bromide (MeBr) is the fumigant of choice for almost all commercial and quarantine fumigations for disinfestation. Since 1992, it is regulated as a significant ozone depleting substance and it is phased out since 2005 with several exemptions like quarantine and preshipment, critical uses and article 5 countries. The main characteristics of MeBr are excellent effectiveness on insects, mites and nematodes, whatever the temperature if it is above 5°C. The exposure time is between 2 to 24 h, and the dosage changes with the temperature. As direct alternatives, only two fumigants remain, phosphine for all stored products and sulfuryl fluoride (SF) for some stored products and structural fumigations. For commercial fumigations, there are two ways to find alternatives: keep the same technique with a curative disinfestation or change completely the way of the treatment. The same (in-kind) techniques are fumigants, included phosphine gas, controlled atmospheres including high pressure CO2, and also contact insecticides, heat and cold, irradiation and some other techniques. The other way is to completely change the production, for example by introducing a better IPM. For quarantine fumigations, it is much more complicated because all the standards used for disinfestation come from lot of studies carried out in many countries, often long ago, giving international rules, based on the probit 9 (99.9968% efficacy). The change to another curative disinfestation like heat, cold or other fumigants needs new studies to prove the quarantine efficacy which means money and time. Systems approaches capitalise on cumulative pest mortality from multiple control components to achieve quarantine security in an exported commodity. In conclusion, many techniques exist for commercial and quarantine MeBr fumigations but they require changes in habits and many times have economic implications. Nevertheless, the ban of MeBr is a fantastic opportunity to find new ways from old or new techniques.

Key concepts: Bromide, Chemistry, Environmental science, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Methyl Bromide Alternatives — Research Paper | ScholarLens