1994PubMedRequires access

Biomechanical simulation of the anteroposterior compression injury of the pelvis. An understanding of instability and fixation.

Peter T. Simonian, Milton L. Chip Routt, R. Harrington, Keith A. Mayo, A. F. Tencer

Open publisher page 97 citations

Abstract

Seven fresh cadaveric pelvic specimens were biomechanically analyzed. Testing was first performed on intact pelves and then after progressive disruption of the (1) symphysis pubis, (2) unilateral anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments and capsule, (3) ipsilateral sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments; and fixation with a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate at the symphysis pubis, or a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate at the anterior sacroiliac joint with and without the symphysis pubis plate, or a 7.0-mm sacroiliac lag screw anchored into the S1 vertebral body with and without the symphysis pubis plate. Symphyseal gapping occurred after isolated symphysis pubis disruption. With additional disruption of the unilateral sacroiliac joint ligaments, symphysis pubis displacement was unaffected; however, the injured sacroiliac joint gap displacement, and sacroiliac joint flexion angulation on both intact and injured sides increased as compared to the specimen in the intact state. Further disruption of the ipsilateral sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligament complex produced little additional motion at either symphysis pubis or sacroiliac joints. Plate fixation of the symphysis pubis alone reduced symphysis pubis motion, but not sacroiliac motion. Use of sacroiliac fixation alone without a symphysis pubis plate did not affect symphysis pubis motion. The symphysis pubis plate is the key to stabilizing symphysis pubis motion, and similarly, sacroiliac joint fixation is required to control sacroiliac joint motion. Both single iliosacral screws and plates produced equivalent decreases in sacroiliac joint motion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seven fresh cadaveric pelvic specimens were biomechanically analyzed. Testing was first performed on intact pelves and then after progressive disruption of the (1) symphysis pubis, (2) unilateral anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments and capsule, (3) ipsilateral sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments; and fixation with a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate at the symphysis pubis, or a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate at the anterior sacroiliac joint with and without the symphysis pubis plate, or a 7.0-mm sacroiliac lag screw anchored into the S1 vertebral body with and without the symphysis pubis plate. Symphyseal gapping occurred after isolated symphysis pubis disruption. With additional disruption of the unilateral sacroiliac joint ligaments, symphysis pubis displacement was unaffected; however, the injured sacroiliac joint gap displacement, and sacroiliac joint flexion angulation on both intact and injured sides increased as compared to the specimen in the intact state. Further disruption of the ipsilateral sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligament complex produced little additional motion at either symphysis pubis or sacroiliac joints. Plate fixation of the symphysis pubis alone reduced symphysis pubis motion, but not sacroiliac motion. Use of sacroiliac fixation alone without a symphysis pubis plate did not affect symphysis pubis motion. The symphysis pubis plate is the key to stabilizing symphysis pubis motion, and similarly, sacroiliac joint fixation is required to control sacroiliac joint motion. Both single iliosacral screws and plates produced equivalent decreases in sacroiliac joint motion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 97 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seven fresh cadaveric pelvic specimens were biomechanically analyzed. Testing was first performed on intact pelves and then after progressive disruption of the (1) symphysis pubis, (2) unilateral anterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments and capsule, (3) ipsilateral sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments; and fixation with a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate at the symphysis pubis, or a 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plate at the anterior sacroiliac joint with and without the symphysis pubis plate, or a 7.0-mm sacroiliac lag screw anchored into the S1 vertebral body with and without the symphysis pubis plate. Symphyseal gapping occurred after isolated symphysis pubis disruption. With additional disruption of the unilateral sacroiliac joint ligaments, symphysis pubis displacement was unaffected; however, the injured sacroiliac joint gap displacement, and sacroiliac joint flexion angulation on both intact and injured sides increased as compared to the specimen in the intact state. Further disruption of the ipsilateral sacrotuberous and sacrospinous ligament complex produced little additional motion at either symphysis pubis or sacroiliac joints. Plate fixation of the symphysis pubis alone reduced symphysis pubis motion, but not sacroiliac motion. Use of sacroiliac fixation alone without a symphysis pubis plate did not affect symphysis pubis motion. The symphysis pubis plate is the key to stabilizing symphysis pubis motion, and similarly, sacroiliac joint fixation is required to control sacroiliac joint motion. Both single iliosacral screws and plates produced equivalent decreases in sacroiliac joint motion.

Key concepts: Symphysis, Sacroiliac joint, Medicine, Pubic symphysis, Cadaveric spasm, Pelvis, Anatomy, Fixation (population genetics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biomechanical simulation of the anteroposterior compression injury of the pelvis. An understanding of instability and fixation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens