2015Voprosy filosofii i psikhologiiRequires access

Philosophical Reflection: Its Essence, Forms, and Types

Feliks V. Lazarev, С. А. Лебедев

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of philosophical reflection, its essence, forms, and types. This may be considered as one of the major issues in the history of philosophy, when it comes to discussing the nature of philosophical cognition and its outcomes, being the subject of profound metaphilosophical analysis in the works of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Bacon, Kant, Husserl, Russell, Heidegger, Ricoeur, Derrida, etc. In modern philosophy, the term ―philosophical reflection‖ is normally used to denote the criticism and clarification of the ultimate grounds, constitutive preconditions of human thinking, communicative practices and practical activity. Here quite a broad problem field for analysis opens up for theoretical philosophy. There are the following forms of reflection as a special cognitive procedure: doubt, irony, criticism, paradox, and questioning. All these forms are of a universal epistemological nature and are applied in all types of human cognition: everyday cognition, arts, science, and philosophy. Applied to philosophical cognition, they gave birth to five major types of philosophical reflection: transdoxical, paradoxical, fundamental, constitutive, and cognitive. The article analyzes the content and characteristics of each of the types of philosophical reflection and discusses the domain and boundaries of their applicability. The authors propose introducing a new, more universal, type of philosophical reflection, which they term ―interval reflection‖.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article addresses the issue of philosophical reflection, its essence, forms, and types. This may be considered as one of the major issues in the history of philosophy, when it comes to discussing the nature of philosophical cognition and its outcomes, being the subject of profound metaphilosophical analysis in the works of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Bacon, Kant, Husserl, Russell, Heidegger, Ricoeur, Derrida, etc. In modern philosophy, the term ―philosophical reflection‖ is normally used to denote the criticism and clarification of the ultimate grounds, constitutive preconditions of human thinking, communicative practices and practical activity. Here quite a broad problem field for analysis opens up for theoretical philosophy. There are the following forms of reflection as a special cognitive procedure: doubt, irony, criticism, paradox, and questioning. All these forms are of a universal epistemological nature and are applied in all types of human cognition: everyday cognition, arts, science, and philosophy. Applied to philosophical cognition, they gave birth to five major types of philosophical reflection: transdoxical, paradoxical, fundamental, constitutive, and cognitive. The article analyzes the content and characteristics of each of the types of philosophical reflection and discusses the domain and boundaries of their applicability. The authors propose introducing a new, more universal, type of philosophical reflection, which they term ―interval reflection‖.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article addresses the issue of philosophical reflection, its essence, forms, and types. This may be considered as one of the major issues in the history of philosophy, when it comes to discussing the nature of philosophical cognition and its outcomes, being the subject of profound metaphilosophical analysis in the works of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Bacon, Kant, Husserl, Russell, Heidegger, Ricoeur, Derrida, etc. In modern philosophy, the term ―philosophical reflection‖ is normally used to denote the criticism and clarification of the ultimate grounds, constitutive preconditions of human thinking, communicative practices and practical activity. Here quite a broad problem field for analysis opens up for theoretical philosophy. There are the following forms of reflection as a special cognitive procedure: doubt, irony, criticism, paradox, and questioning. All these forms are of a universal epistemological nature and are applied in all types of human cognition: everyday cognition, arts, science, and philosophy. Applied to philosophical cognition, they gave birth to five major types of philosophical reflection: transdoxical, paradoxical, fundamental, constitutive, and cognitive. The article analyzes the content and characteristics of each of the types of philosophical reflection and discusses the domain and boundaries of their applicability. The authors propose introducing a new, more universal, type of philosophical reflection, which they term ―interval reflection‖.

Key concepts: Reflection (computer programming), Epistemology, Philosophy, Psychology, Computer science, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophical Reflection: Its Essence, Forms, and Types — Research Paper | ScholarLens