1985PubMedRequires access

Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.

Levy Ns, Ester M. Ellis

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Goldmann kinetic perimetry is a commonly used measurement of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. The many new automated perimeters should be assessed against this common standard with a view to comparing their sensitivity in making clinical judgments of the presence and extent of a visual field defect. This study compares the Coopervision Dicon 2000 perimeter and its automated two-zone suprathreshold program with Goldmann kinetic perimetry in 26 patients with open-angle glaucoma. The two-zone suprathreshold testing program on the Coopervision Dicon perimeter was found to be at least as sensitive as the Goldmann kinetic perimeter in identifying the presence and extent of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Goldmann kinetic perimetry is a commonly used measurement of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. The many new automated perimeters should be assessed against this common standard with a view to comparing their sensitivity in making clinical judgments of the presence and extent of a visual field defect. This study compares the Coopervision Dicon 2000 perimeter and its automated two-zone suprathreshold program with Goldmann kinetic perimetry in 26 patients with open-angle glaucoma. The two-zone suprathreshold testing program on the Coopervision Dicon perimeter was found to be at least as sensitive as the Goldmann kinetic perimeter in identifying the presence and extent of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Goldmann kinetic perimetry is a commonly used measurement of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. The many new automated perimeters should be assessed against this common standard with a view to comparing their sensitivity in making clinical judgments of the presence and extent of a visual field defect. This study compares the Coopervision Dicon 2000 perimeter and its automated two-zone suprathreshold program with Goldmann kinetic perimetry in 26 patients with open-angle glaucoma. The two-zone suprathreshold testing program on the Coopervision Dicon perimeter was found to be at least as sensitive as the Goldmann kinetic perimeter in identifying the presence and extent of visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma.

Key concepts: Visual field, Glaucoma, Perimeter, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Open angle glaucoma, Blind spot

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma. — Research Paper | ScholarLens