2007The Korean Journal of Internal MedicineOpen access

Comparison of the ambulatory blood pressure with the clinical blood pressure and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy

Seung-Hoon Park, Duk-Won Bang, John Seo, Sung‐Wook Hong, Do-Hoi Kim, Yeo-Joon Yoon, Ji-Hoon Ahn, Min‐Su Hyon, Sung-Koo Kim, Youngjoo Kwon

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Background : This study compared the results of 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with the clinical blood pressure measurements, and we investigated the relationship of the blood pressure measurement and left ventricular hypertrophy, as determined by routine 12 lead electrocardiography. Methods : We studied 204 healthy adults with no prior history of heart disease or antihypertensive medication. The clinic blood pressure was measured 3 times and the average was taken. We compared the clinic blood pressure with the daytime blood pressure of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and we compared the blood pressure with the sum of the voltage of the S wave on V1 and the R wave on V5. Results : The average of the daytime ambulatory blood pressure of all the patients was 135.33± 13.73 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 86.55±10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The average of the clinic blood pressure measurement was 140.10±17.41 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 88.84 ±10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The clinic blood pressure averaged higher than the daytime ambulatory blood pressure by 5 mmHg on the systolic pressure and 2 mmHg on the diastolic pressure (p<0.001). The normal ambulatory blood pressure limits were estimated as those that best correlated with 140/90 mmHg at the clinic. The estimated value was 135/87 mmHg for the daytime ambulatory blood pressure (p<0.001). The incidence of white coat hypertension was 10.8%. The sum of the voltage on electrocardiography showed a positive linear relationship with all the blood pressure measurements. The daytime systolic blood pressure showed the strongest correlation with the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r=0.283, p<0.001). Conclusions : We found a linear relation and we analyzed the differences between the clinical and 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure. A daytime ambulatory blood pressure value of 135/87 mmHg was a suitable upper normal limit for the corresponding cutoff value of the clinic blood pressure. Left ventricular hypertrophy showed the strongest relationship with the daytime systolic blood pressure among the results of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.(Korean J Med 72:181-190, 2007)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background : This study compared the results of 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with the clinical blood pressure measurements, and we investigated the relationship of the blood pressure measurement and left ventricular hypertrophy, as determined by routine 12 lead electrocardiography. Methods : We studied 204 healthy adults with no prior history of heart disease or antihypertensive medication. The clinic blood pressure was measured 3 times and the average was taken. We compared the clinic blood pressure with the daytime blood pressure of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and we compared the blood pressure with the sum of the voltage of the S wave on V1 and the R wave on V5. Results : The average of the daytime ambulatory blood pressure of all the patients was 135.33± 13.73 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 86.55±10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The average of the clinic blood pressure measurement was 140.10±17.41 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 88.84 ±10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The clinic blood pressure averaged higher than the daytime ambulatory blood pressure by 5 mmHg on the systolic pressure and 2 mmHg on the diastolic pressure (p<0.001). The normal ambulatory blood pressure limits were estimated as those that best correlated with 140/90 mmHg at the clinic. The estimated value was 135/87 mmHg for the daytime ambulatory blood pressure (p<0.001). The incidence of white coat hypertension was 10.8%. The sum of the voltage on electrocardiography showed a positive linear relationship with all the blood pressure measurements. The daytime systolic blood pressure showed the strongest correlation with the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r=0.283, p<0.001). Conclusions : We found a linear relation and we analyzed the differences between the clinical and 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure. A daytime ambulatory blood pressure value of 135/87 mmHg was a suitable upper normal limit for the corresponding cutoff value of the clinic blood pressure. Left ventricular hypertrophy showed the strongest relationship with the daytime systolic blood pressure among the results of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.(Korean J Med 72:181-190, 2007)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background : This study compared the results of 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with the clinical blood pressure measurements, and we investigated the relationship of the blood pressure measurement and left ventricular hypertrophy, as determined by routine 12 lead electrocardiography. Methods : We studied 204 healthy adults with no prior history of heart disease or antihypertensive medication. The clinic blood pressure was measured 3 times and the average was taken. We compared the clinic blood pressure with the daytime blood pressure of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and we compared the blood pressure with the sum of the voltage of the S wave on V1 and the R wave on V5. Results : The average of the daytime ambulatory blood pressure of all the patients was 135.33± 13.73 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 86.55±10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The average of the clinic blood pressure measurement was 140.10±17.41 mmHg for the systolic pressure and 88.84 ±10.14 mmHg for the diastolic pressure. The clinic blood pressure averaged higher than the daytime ambulatory blood pressure by 5 mmHg on the systolic pressure and 2 mmHg on the diastolic pressure (p<0.001). The normal ambulatory blood pressure limits were estimated as those that best correlated with 140/90 mmHg at the clinic. The estimated value was 135/87 mmHg for the daytime ambulatory blood pressure (p<0.001). The incidence of white coat hypertension was 10.8%. The sum of the voltage on electrocardiography showed a positive linear relationship with all the blood pressure measurements. The daytime systolic blood pressure showed the strongest correlation with the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r=0.283, p<0.001). Conclusions : We found a linear relation and we analyzed the differences between the clinical and 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure. A daytime ambulatory blood pressure value of 135/87 mmHg was a suitable upper normal limit for the corresponding cutoff value of the clinic blood pressure. Left ventricular hypertrophy showed the strongest relationship with the daytime systolic blood pressure among the results of the 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.(Korean J Med 72:181-190, 2007)

Key concepts: Medicine, Blood pressure, Ambulatory blood pressure, Cardiology, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Internal medicine, Diastole, Prehypertension

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the ambulatory blood pressure with the clinical blood pressure and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy — Research Paper | ScholarLens