ScholarLens Back to search
2013•Software Engineering and Knowledge EngineeringRequires access

Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming

Fumiya Kato, Kazunori Sakamoto, Hironori Washizaki, Yoshiaki Fukazawa

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP and study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP and study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are many programming paradigms for the separation of concerns (SoC). Each paradigm modularizes concerns in a different way. Context-oriented programming (COP) has been developed as a supplement to objectoriented programming (OOP), which is one of the most widely used paradigms for SoC. It modularizes concerns that are difficult for OOP. In this paper, we focus on three paradigms OOP, aspect-oriented programming (proposed as a supplement to OOP that has a different approach from COP), and COP and study whether COP can modularize concerns better than other two paradigms in given situations. Then we determine the reasons why COP can or cannot better modularize concerns.

Key concepts: Separation of concerns, Object-oriented programming, Computer science, Aspect-oriented programming, Context (archaeology), Programming paradigm, Programming language, Functional reactive programming

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative evaluation of programming paradigms: Separation of concerns with object-, aspect-, and context-oriented programming — Research Paper | ScholarLens