1990PubMedRequires access

[Biological monitoring of treatment with antivitamin K. Value of INR and definition of new therapeutic ranges. A study of 73 patients].

Isabelle Gouin, M.H. Horellou, J Conard, M Samama

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The prothrombin time test (PT) is the most common method used for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy. As a consequence of the variability in responsiveness of different thromboplastins, PT results obtained from patients on oral anticoagulant therapy may not be interchangeable between laboratories and as consequence could produce potential problems for anticoagulant control. The conversion of PT in INR (International Normalized Ratio) has been introduced recently to standardise the PT used for anticoagulant control. 127 determinations of prothrombin time and INR with 2 different thromboplastin reagents (Thromboplastin C Dade and Owren reagent) have been performed in 73 patients. This study confirm the usefulness of the INR (INR discrepancy in 10% of the cases) despite the imperfections concerning the choice of the control plasma and the need of a precise measurement of the ISI, International Sensitivity index. In parallel, changes in therapeutic ranges for anticoagulant therapy occurred, based on results of the international literature: less intense anticoagulant treatment (INR 2-3) is effective against recurrent venous thromboembolism with reduced bleeding. Different therapeutic ranges must be recommended for oral anticoagulant therapy according to the indication of the treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The prothrombin time test (PT) is the most common method used for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy. As a consequence of the variability in responsiveness of different thromboplastins, PT results obtained from patients on oral anticoagulant therapy may not be interchangeable between laboratories and as consequence could produce potential problems for anticoagulant control. The conversion of PT in INR (International Normalized Ratio) has been introduced recently to standardise the PT used for anticoagulant control. 127 determinations of prothrombin time and INR with 2 different thromboplastin reagents (Thromboplastin C Dade and Owren reagent) have been performed in 73 patients. This study confirm the usefulness of the INR (INR discrepancy in 10% of the cases) despite the imperfections concerning the choice of the control plasma and the need of a precise measurement of the ISI, International Sensitivity index. In parallel, changes in therapeutic ranges for anticoagulant therapy occurred, based on results of the international literature: less intense anticoagulant treatment (INR 2-3) is effective against recurrent venous thromboembolism with reduced bleeding. Different therapeutic ranges must be recommended for oral anticoagulant therapy according to the indication of the treatment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The prothrombin time test (PT) is the most common method used for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy. As a consequence of the variability in responsiveness of different thromboplastins, PT results obtained from patients on oral anticoagulant therapy may not be interchangeable between laboratories and as consequence could produce potential problems for anticoagulant control. The conversion of PT in INR (International Normalized Ratio) has been introduced recently to standardise the PT used for anticoagulant control. 127 determinations of prothrombin time and INR with 2 different thromboplastin reagents (Thromboplastin C Dade and Owren reagent) have been performed in 73 patients. This study confirm the usefulness of the INR (INR discrepancy in 10% of the cases) despite the imperfections concerning the choice of the control plasma and the need of a precise measurement of the ISI, International Sensitivity index. In parallel, changes in therapeutic ranges for anticoagulant therapy occurred, based on results of the international literature: less intense anticoagulant treatment (INR 2-3) is effective against recurrent venous thromboembolism with reduced bleeding. Different therapeutic ranges must be recommended for oral anticoagulant therapy according to the indication of the treatment.

Key concepts: Medicine, Oral anticoagulant, Prothrombin time, Anticoagulant therapy, Thromboplastin, Anticoagulant, Therapeutic index, Partial thromboplastin time

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Biological monitoring of treatment with antivitamin K. Value of INR and definition of new therapeutic ranges. A study of 73 patients]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens