Safety and Efficacy of Cefixime versus Cefaclor in Respiratory Tract Infections
P Dorow
Abstract
P Dorow
Abstract
A randomized controlled study design was used to compare the efficacy of cefixime versus cefaclor in 30 patients suffering from lower respiratory tract infections. Patients were treated with a 10 to 11 day course of cefixime 200 mg b.i.d. or cefaclor 500 mg t.i.d. The overall clinical response (cured and improved) in the 13 evaluable patients of the cefixime group was 100%. 12 of the 14 patients of the cefaclor group were cured or improved. In the two other patients the symptoms remained unchanged. The bacteriological efficacy in both groups was comparable. Adverse effects were not reported during the study.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A randomized controlled study design was used to compare the efficacy of cefixime versus cefaclor in 30 patients suffering from lower respiratory tract infections. Patients were treated with a 10 to 11 day course of cefixime 200 mg b.i.d. or cefaclor 500 mg t.i.d. The overall clinical response (cured and improved) in the 13 evaluable patients of the cefixime group was 100%. 12 of the 14 patients of the cefaclor group were cured or improved. In the two other patients the symptoms remained unchanged. The bacteriological efficacy in both groups was comparable. Adverse effects were not reported during the study.
Key concepts: Cefaclor, Cefixime, Medicine, Respiratory tract infections, Adverse effect, Internal medicine, Cephalosporin, Gastroenterology