2010PubMedRequires access

[Landmark method and ultrasound-guided method of internal jugular vein puncture: comparison of residents with staffs].

Go Kusumoto, Yasuyuki Sugi, Kazuo Higa, Shinjirou Shono, Kiyoshi Katori, Keiichi Nitahara

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared landmark with ultrasound-guided methods of internal jugular vein puncture in residents and staffs. METHODS: Seven residents and five staffs practiced internal jugular vein puncture with landmark and ultrasound-guided methods on a manikin for internal jugular vein cannulation. Thereafter, they performed internal jugular vein cannulation on 42 patients. RESULTS: Number of attempts of internal jugular vein cannulation by the residents was significantly lower with ultrasound-guided method than with landmark method. Three internal jugular veins could not be cannulated by residents with landmark method. The common carotid artery was punctured in one case with either method by residents. CONCLUSIONS: Residents need more practice of internal jugular vein puncture on a manikin before clinical practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: We compared landmark with ultrasound-guided methods of internal jugular vein puncture in residents and staffs. METHODS: Seven residents and five staffs practiced internal jugular vein puncture with landmark and ultrasound-guided methods on a manikin for internal jugular vein cannulation. Thereafter, they performed internal jugular vein cannulation on 42 patients. RESULTS: Number of attempts of internal jugular vein cannulation by the residents was significantly lower with ultrasound-guided method than with landmark method. Three internal jugular veins could not be cannulated by residents with landmark method. The common carotid artery was punctured in one case with either method by residents. CONCLUSIONS: Residents need more practice of internal jugular vein puncture on a manikin before clinical practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared landmark with ultrasound-guided methods of internal jugular vein puncture in residents and staffs. METHODS: Seven residents and five staffs practiced internal jugular vein puncture with landmark and ultrasound-guided methods on a manikin for internal jugular vein cannulation. Thereafter, they performed internal jugular vein cannulation on 42 patients. RESULTS: Number of attempts of internal jugular vein cannulation by the residents was significantly lower with ultrasound-guided method than with landmark method. Three internal jugular veins could not be cannulated by residents with landmark method. The common carotid artery was punctured in one case with either method by residents. CONCLUSIONS: Residents need more practice of internal jugular vein puncture on a manikin before clinical practice.

Key concepts: Internal jugular vein, Medicine, Anatomical landmark, Ultrasound, Vein, Landmark, Jugular vein, External jugular vein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Landmark method and ultrasound-guided method of internal jugular vein puncture: comparison of residents with staffs]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens