2005Unpublished venueRequires access

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC STUDY ON DAVALLIACEAE

Chie Tsutsumi, Masahiro Kato

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

In previous classifications based on morphological characters, Davalliaceae comprises from four to ten genera, whose concepts differ among authors. This study analyzed a molecular phylogeny of 36 species in five genera. Deduced phylogenetic relationships based on a combined dataset of five continuous chloroplast regions, atpB, rbcL, accD, atpB-rbcL spacer, and rbcL-accD spacer, are incongruent to any previous classifications, and none of the genera are monophyletic. Araiostegia is divided to two clades, one of which is the most basal and includes Davallodes, and the other is nested within the rest of the family. Davallia is divided into three clades, in accordance with three sections classified mainly by scale morphologies, and the clades are separated by the intervention of a clade of Araiostegia, Humata and Scyphularia. Humata and Scyphularia are also paraphyletic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In previous classifications based on morphological characters, Davalliaceae comprises from four to ten genera, whose concepts differ among authors. This study analyzed a molecular phylogeny of 36 species in five genera. Deduced phylogenetic relationships based on a combined dataset of five continuous chloroplast regions, atpB, rbcL, accD, atpB-rbcL spacer, and rbcL-accD spacer, are incongruent to any previous classifications, and none of the genera are monophyletic. Araiostegia is divided to two clades, one of which is the most basal and includes Davallodes, and the other is nested within the rest of the family. Davallia is divided into three clades, in accordance with three sections classified mainly by scale morphologies, and the clades are separated by the intervention of a clade of Araiostegia, Humata and Scyphularia. Humata and Scyphularia are also paraphyletic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In previous classifications based on morphological characters, Davalliaceae comprises from four to ten genera, whose concepts differ among authors. This study analyzed a molecular phylogeny of 36 species in five genera. Deduced phylogenetic relationships based on a combined dataset of five continuous chloroplast regions, atpB, rbcL, accD, atpB-rbcL spacer, and rbcL-accD spacer, are incongruent to any previous classifications, and none of the genera are monophyletic. Araiostegia is divided to two clades, one of which is the most basal and includes Davallodes, and the other is nested within the rest of the family. Davallia is divided into three clades, in accordance with three sections classified mainly by scale morphologies, and the clades are separated by the intervention of a clade of Araiostegia, Humata and Scyphularia. Humata and Scyphularia are also paraphyletic.

Key concepts: Paraphyly, Clade, Monophyly, Phylogenetic tree, Biology, Molecular phylogenetics, Evolutionary biology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC STUDY ON DAVALLIACEAE — Research Paper | ScholarLens