2004PubMedRequires access

Prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Peter Jepsen, Hendrik Vilstrup, Jens Kjølseth Møller, Henrik Toft Sørensen

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites have a high risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, but the prognostic impact of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis has not been well examined. METHODOLOGY: Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites were included at the time of their first paracentesis during hospitalization in the Department of Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between September 1992 and September 2000. Cox regression was used to estimate the mortality of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (ascites leukocyte count > or = 250 per mm3) relative to controls without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Furthermore, we used Cox regression to estimate the change in mortality when controls developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 286 patients, 76 (27%) had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at the first paracentesis. The mortality ratio of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis relative to controls was 1.0 (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.5) after adjustment for age, gender, comorbidity, and alcohol abuse. Of the 210 controls, 42 (20%) were found to have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at a later paracentesis. Their mortality rate more than doubled with the onset of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at the first paracentesis did not affect the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis, whereas development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up doubled the mortality risk. This may be due to a longer diagnostic delay in those who developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites have a high risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, but the prognostic impact of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis has not been well examined. METHODOLOGY: Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites were included at the time of their first paracentesis during hospitalization in the Department of Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between September 1992 and September 2000. Cox regression was used to estimate the mortality of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (ascites leukocyte count > or = 250 per mm3) relative to controls without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Furthermore, we used Cox regression to estimate the change in mortality when controls developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 286 patients, 76 (27%) had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at the first paracentesis. The mortality ratio of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis relative to controls was 1.0 (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.5) after adjustment for age, gender, comorbidity, and alcohol abuse. Of the 210 controls, 42 (20%) were found to have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at a later paracentesis. Their mortality rate more than doubled with the onset of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at the first paracentesis did not affect the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis, whereas development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up doubled the mortality risk. This may be due to a longer diagnostic delay in those who developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites have a high risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, but the prognostic impact of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis has not been well examined. METHODOLOGY: Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites were included at the time of their first paracentesis during hospitalization in the Department of Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between September 1992 and September 2000. Cox regression was used to estimate the mortality of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (ascites leukocyte count > or = 250 per mm3) relative to controls without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Furthermore, we used Cox regression to estimate the change in mortality when controls developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 286 patients, 76 (27%) had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at the first paracentesis. The mortality ratio of patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis relative to controls was 1.0 (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.5) after adjustment for age, gender, comorbidity, and alcohol abuse. Of the 210 controls, 42 (20%) were found to have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at a later paracentesis. Their mortality rate more than doubled with the onset of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis at the first paracentesis did not affect the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis, whereas development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up doubled the mortality risk. This may be due to a longer diagnostic delay in those who developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during follow-up.

Key concepts: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, Medicine, Ascites, Cirrhosis, Peritonitis, Paracentesis, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens