2003Annals of Rehabilitation MedicineOpen access

Measurements of Lumbar Segmental Range of Motion with 3-dimensional Motion Analysis in Healthy Adults

Moon-Suk Bang, Tae-Ryoon Han, Joong-Kyung Choi, Sang-Jun Kim, Jae-Moon Kwak, Young-Jin Jo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To measure the lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) with 3-dimensional motion analysis system and compare the results wifh radiologic ROM measurements. Method: Ten healthy adult volunteers were included. We attached surface markers at the corresponding skin surface of each lumbar vertebral bcdies and measured lumbar segmental ROM in flexion-extension, right bending, left bending, axial rotation with 3-D motion analysis. We compared some of the results with radiologic segmental ROM measurements. Results: In 3-D motion analysis, segmental ROM of flexion and extension, right bending, left bending, right rotation, lef rotation were, respectively: 10.1(), 45(), 3.5(), 1.7() and 1.9() (L1-L2); 17.9(),6.2(),5.1(), 1.4() and 1.10 (L2-L3); 15.0(),7.2(), 4.9(), 2.1() and 1.10 (L3-L4); 14.9(), 5.8(), 4.6, 1.7() and 1.6() (L4-L5); 10.6(), 4.9(), 3.8(), 2.6() and 0.8() (L5-S1). There was no statistically significant difference in segmental ROM between 3-D motion analysis measurements and radiologic measurements except L5-S1 right bending, L2-L3 and L5-S1 left bending. No statistical significant difference in lumbar flexion and bending ROM was found between two methods. Conclusion: 3-D motion analysis is a useful method when measuring the lumbar segmental range of motion and it has an advantage to analyze segmental lumbar motion with three directions simultaneously.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To measure the lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) with 3-dimensional motion analysis system and compare the results wifh radiologic ROM measurements. Method: Ten healthy adult volunteers were included. We attached surface markers at the corresponding skin surface of each lumbar vertebral bcdies and measured lumbar segmental ROM in flexion-extension, right bending, left bending, axial rotation with 3-D motion analysis. We compared some of the results with radiologic segmental ROM measurements. Results: In 3-D motion analysis, segmental ROM of flexion and extension, right bending, left bending, right rotation, lef rotation were, respectively: 10.1(), 45(), 3.5(), 1.7() and 1.9() (L1-L2); 17.9(),6.2(),5.1(), 1.4() and 1.10 (L2-L3); 15.0(),7.2(), 4.9(), 2.1() and 1.10 (L3-L4); 14.9(), 5.8(), 4.6, 1.7() and 1.6() (L4-L5); 10.6(), 4.9(), 3.8(), 2.6() and 0.8() (L5-S1). There was no statistically significant difference in segmental ROM between 3-D motion analysis measurements and radiologic measurements except L5-S1 right bending, L2-L3 and L5-S1 left bending. No statistical significant difference in lumbar flexion and bending ROM was found between two methods. Conclusion: 3-D motion analysis is a useful method when measuring the lumbar segmental range of motion and it has an advantage to analyze segmental lumbar motion with three directions simultaneously.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To measure the lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) with 3-dimensional motion analysis system and compare the results wifh radiologic ROM measurements. Method: Ten healthy adult volunteers were included. We attached surface markers at the corresponding skin surface of each lumbar vertebral bcdies and measured lumbar segmental ROM in flexion-extension, right bending, left bending, axial rotation with 3-D motion analysis. We compared some of the results with radiologic segmental ROM measurements. Results: In 3-D motion analysis, segmental ROM of flexion and extension, right bending, left bending, right rotation, lef rotation were, respectively: 10.1(), 45(), 3.5(), 1.7() and 1.9() (L1-L2); 17.9(),6.2(),5.1(), 1.4() and 1.10 (L2-L3); 15.0(),7.2(), 4.9(), 2.1() and 1.10 (L3-L4); 14.9(), 5.8(), 4.6, 1.7() and 1.6() (L4-L5); 10.6(), 4.9(), 3.8(), 2.6() and 0.8() (L5-S1). There was no statistically significant difference in segmental ROM between 3-D motion analysis measurements and radiologic measurements except L5-S1 right bending, L2-L3 and L5-S1 left bending. No statistical significant difference in lumbar flexion and bending ROM was found between two methods. Conclusion: 3-D motion analysis is a useful method when measuring the lumbar segmental range of motion and it has an advantage to analyze segmental lumbar motion with three directions simultaneously.

Key concepts: Range of motion, Lumbar, Medicine, Rotation (mathematics), Motion analysis, Bending, Motion (physics), Lumbar spine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurements of Lumbar Segmental Range of Motion with 3-dimensional Motion Analysis in Healthy Adults — Research Paper | ScholarLens