[Quality of life, needs and treatment evaluation of long-term hospitalized patients. Part II of the Berlin Deinstitutionalization Study].
Karin G. Hoffmann, Stefan Priebe, Margarete Isermann, Wanda Kaiser
Abstract
Karin G. Hoffmann, Stefan Priebe, Margarete Isermann, Wanda Kaiser
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Objective living situation, subjective quality of life, need for care, and assessment of treatment of long-term hospitalised patients were investigated. METHODS: 237 patients from 6 hospitals were examined using standardised instruments. RESULTS: Patients' satisfaction was generally relatively high, but varied greatly in subgroups and individuals. Patients were most satisfied with personal safety in the hospital and least satisfied with the expectation to live in the hospital for a long time. Therapists assessed clearly more needs for care in the patients than the patients did themselves. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between the subjective quality of life in different domains, the number of needs stated and plausible determining factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reflecting patients' living situation in the hospital are very heterogeneous. In respect of subjective evaluation criteria, there is little space for improvement in the future.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: Objective living situation, subjective quality of life, need for care, and assessment of treatment of long-term hospitalised patients were investigated. METHODS: 237 patients from 6 hospitals were examined using standardised instruments. RESULTS: Patients' satisfaction was generally relatively high, but varied greatly in subgroups and individuals. Patients were most satisfied with personal safety in the hospital and least satisfied with the expectation to live in the hospital for a long time. Therapists assessed clearly more needs for care in the patients than the patients did themselves. Statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between the subjective quality of life in different domains, the number of needs stated and plausible determining factors. CONCLUSIONS: Findings reflecting patients' living situation in the hospital are very heterogeneous. In respect of subjective evaluation criteria, there is little space for improvement in the future.
Key concepts: Quality of life (healthcare), Medicine, Long-term care, Term (time), Patient satisfaction, Gerontology, Psychology, Psychiatry