1990PubMedRequires access

[Anaphylactic shock following topical use of thrombin for irrigation of urinary bladder].

Akira Sasaki, Yasuki Hashimoto, Eba Y, Hiroto Fudeta, Saburo SHIOZAWA, Yasuyuki Imai

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A 55-yr-old male with carcinoma of bladder received transurethral coagulation (TUC) under epidural anesthesia. A few min after the operation, he went into anaphylactic shock during irrigation of urinary bladder with thrombin solution. The symptoms were epigastralgia, circulatory collapse, skin rashes over the whole body and dyspnea. Oxygen inhalation and iv administration of epinephrine and steroid were performed, and his general condition improved within several hours. On the 2nd day after recovery from the anaphylactic shock, the patient received prick test on several agents which he had been given during operation. Prick test and RAST (radioallergosorbent test) on thrombin were positive. Based on our experience, thrombin may act to produce anaphylactic reaction. Although anaphylactic shock following topical thrombin is rare, we feel that thrombin should not be used without prick test.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A 55-yr-old male with carcinoma of bladder received transurethral coagulation (TUC) under epidural anesthesia. A few min after the operation, he went into anaphylactic shock during irrigation of urinary bladder with thrombin solution. The symptoms were epigastralgia, circulatory collapse, skin rashes over the whole body and dyspnea. Oxygen inhalation and iv administration of epinephrine and steroid were performed, and his general condition improved within several hours. On the 2nd day after recovery from the anaphylactic shock, the patient received prick test on several agents which he had been given during operation. Prick test and RAST (radioallergosorbent test) on thrombin were positive. Based on our experience, thrombin may act to produce anaphylactic reaction. Although anaphylactic shock following topical thrombin is rare, we feel that thrombin should not be used without prick test.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A 55-yr-old male with carcinoma of bladder received transurethral coagulation (TUC) under epidural anesthesia. A few min after the operation, he went into anaphylactic shock during irrigation of urinary bladder with thrombin solution. The symptoms were epigastralgia, circulatory collapse, skin rashes over the whole body and dyspnea. Oxygen inhalation and iv administration of epinephrine and steroid were performed, and his general condition improved within several hours. On the 2nd day after recovery from the anaphylactic shock, the patient received prick test on several agents which he had been given during operation. Prick test and RAST (radioallergosorbent test) on thrombin were positive. Based on our experience, thrombin may act to produce anaphylactic reaction. Although anaphylactic shock following topical thrombin is rare, we feel that thrombin should not be used without prick test.

Key concepts: Medicine, Anesthesia, Epinephrine, Thrombin, Anaphylactic shock, Anaphylactic reactions, Urinary bladder, Shock (circulatory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Anaphylactic shock following topical use of thrombin for irrigation of urinary bladder]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens