1989PubMedRequires access

Interrater reliability in masticatory muscle palpation.

Stockstill Jw, Gross Aj, McCall Wd

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Muscle palpation is an important procedure in screening for TM disorders and assessing results of treatment outcome studies, but interpretation of response may be subjective and vulnerable to examiner bias. Masticatory muscle palpation scoring was evaluated with respect to interrater agreement on 31 myofascial pain-dysfunction patients participating in a medication study. Two clinicians independently palpated the temporomandibular joints, muscles of mastication, and related head and neck musculature on three different occasions over the 6-week period of the study. Standardization of palpation technique and initial protocol for interpretation of subject response were discussed prior to the first examination. Further clarification and reinforcement of examination methodology and scoring were carried out prior to the second examination, 1 week later. Another 5 weeks passed, with no further standardization, before the third and last examination. A behaviorally anchored scoring system (0 to 3) was used to rate response to palpation. Results indicate that two investigators can achieve a fair degree of reliability when carefully standardized, further interrater standardization can result in higher reliability, and reliability can be maintained over at least a 5-week period of time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Muscle palpation is an important procedure in screening for TM disorders and assessing results of treatment outcome studies, but interpretation of response may be subjective and vulnerable to examiner bias. Masticatory muscle palpation scoring was evaluated with respect to interrater agreement on 31 myofascial pain-dysfunction patients participating in a medication study. Two clinicians independently palpated the temporomandibular joints, muscles of mastication, and related head and neck musculature on three different occasions over the 6-week period of the study. Standardization of palpation technique and initial protocol for interpretation of subject response were discussed prior to the first examination. Further clarification and reinforcement of examination methodology and scoring were carried out prior to the second examination, 1 week later. Another 5 weeks passed, with no further standardization, before the third and last examination. A behaviorally anchored scoring system (0 to 3) was used to rate response to palpation. Results indicate that two investigators can achieve a fair degree of reliability when carefully standardized, further interrater standardization can result in higher reliability, and reliability can be maintained over at least a 5-week period of time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Muscle palpation is an important procedure in screening for TM disorders and assessing results of treatment outcome studies, but interpretation of response may be subjective and vulnerable to examiner bias. Masticatory muscle palpation scoring was evaluated with respect to interrater agreement on 31 myofascial pain-dysfunction patients participating in a medication study. Two clinicians independently palpated the temporomandibular joints, muscles of mastication, and related head and neck musculature on three different occasions over the 6-week period of the study. Standardization of palpation technique and initial protocol for interpretation of subject response were discussed prior to the first examination. Further clarification and reinforcement of examination methodology and scoring were carried out prior to the second examination, 1 week later. Another 5 weeks passed, with no further standardization, before the third and last examination. A behaviorally anchored scoring system (0 to 3) was used to rate response to palpation. Results indicate that two investigators can achieve a fair degree of reliability when carefully standardized, further interrater standardization can result in higher reliability, and reliability can be maintained over at least a 5-week period of time.

Key concepts: Palpation, Inter-rater reliability, Masticatory force, Medicine, Mastication, Physical examination, Physical therapy, Reliability (semiconductor)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interrater reliability in masticatory muscle palpation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens