2006PubMedRequires access

Biomechanical modeling of brace design.

Julien Clin, Carl‐Éric Aubin, Stefan Parent, Janet L. Ronsky, Hubert Labelle

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical effectiveness of brace design parameters in right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: A finite element model (FEM) of the spine, rib cage, pelvis and abdomen was adapted to the geometry of 8 patients with right-thoracic idiopathic scoliosis using a multi-view radiographic reconstruction technique. A detailed parametric FEM of a thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis and a Box, Hunter & Hunter experimental design method were used to analyze the contribution of brace design parameters (brace size, number of straps, strap tension, position of the thoracic pad, lordosis reduction design) and of patient's spine stiffness. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle correction of the thoracic curve was 5.1 degrees (0 degrees to 16 degrees). The most influential parameters were, in descending order, the strap tension, lordosis reduction design and spine stiffness. Their effects are independent and remain weak (-3 degrees when strap tension increases from 20 N to 60 N). Changing the position of the thoracic pad (slightly above or below the apex) doesn't have a significant effect. No significant correction of the axial rotation and rib hump was obtained. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: Frontal curve correction varied significantly, which justifies the need for an adequate adjustment of the brace. A more efficient design for the correction of transverse deformities remains to be found. The "active" correction component by the muscles was not included, but one can anticipate that its action would be concurrent to the passive brace mechanisms, enabling supplementary correction. A new tool simulating brace treatment has been developed, which allows rational design of braces.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical effectiveness of brace design parameters in right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: A finite element model (FEM) of the spine, rib cage, pelvis and abdomen was adapted to the geometry of 8 patients with right-thoracic idiopathic scoliosis using a multi-view radiographic reconstruction technique. A detailed parametric FEM of a thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis and a Box, Hunter & Hunter experimental design method were used to analyze the contribution of brace design parameters (brace size, number of straps, strap tension, position of the thoracic pad, lordosis reduction design) and of patient's spine stiffness. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle correction of the thoracic curve was 5.1 degrees (0 degrees to 16 degrees). The most influential parameters were, in descending order, the strap tension, lordosis reduction design and spine stiffness. Their effects are independent and remain weak (-3 degrees when strap tension increases from 20 N to 60 N). Changing the position of the thoracic pad (slightly above or below the apex) doesn't have a significant effect. No significant correction of the axial rotation and rib hump was obtained. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: Frontal curve correction varied significantly, which justifies the need for an adequate adjustment of the brace. A more efficient design for the correction of transverse deformities remains to be found. The "active" correction component by the muscles was not included, but one can anticipate that its action would be concurrent to the passive brace mechanisms, enabling supplementary correction. A new tool simulating brace treatment has been developed, which allows rational design of braces.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the biomechanical effectiveness of brace design parameters in right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: A finite element model (FEM) of the spine, rib cage, pelvis and abdomen was adapted to the geometry of 8 patients with right-thoracic idiopathic scoliosis using a multi-view radiographic reconstruction technique. A detailed parametric FEM of a thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis and a Box, Hunter & Hunter experimental design method were used to analyze the contribution of brace design parameters (brace size, number of straps, strap tension, position of the thoracic pad, lordosis reduction design) and of patient's spine stiffness. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle correction of the thoracic curve was 5.1 degrees (0 degrees to 16 degrees). The most influential parameters were, in descending order, the strap tension, lordosis reduction design and spine stiffness. Their effects are independent and remain weak (-3 degrees when strap tension increases from 20 N to 60 N). Changing the position of the thoracic pad (slightly above or below the apex) doesn't have a significant effect. No significant correction of the axial rotation and rib hump was obtained. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: Frontal curve correction varied significantly, which justifies the need for an adequate adjustment of the brace. A more efficient design for the correction of transverse deformities remains to be found. The "active" correction component by the muscles was not included, but one can anticipate that its action would be concurrent to the passive brace mechanisms, enabling supplementary correction. A new tool simulating brace treatment has been developed, which allows rational design of braces.

Key concepts: Brace, Finite element method, Scoliosis, Pelvis, Orthodontics, Rib cage, Stiffness, Sagittal plane

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biomechanical modeling of brace design. — Research Paper | ScholarLens