1993SLEEPRequires access

The Second Generation of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices. Are They Created Equal?

Alejandro D. Chediak, Eric Lipson, M. C. Demirozu, Michael Kiel

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is considered the preferred medical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Because NCPAP exerts its beneficial effects by maintaining positive airway pressure, we proposed to test the ability of the newer "second generation" NCPAP machines to maintain a constant airway pressure during simulated breathing on a lung model. Each of the seven new NCPAP devices tested were examined under conditions of changing inspiratory flow, end expiratory pressure (EEP) and resistance added to the patient end of the NCPAP hose. During inspiration airway pressure fell and in expiration it increased relative to the EEP in all machines. Using the standard NCPAP hose and a breathing pattern consistent with normal breathing during sleep, the maximum decline in pressure during simulated inspiration and excess pressure during simulated expiration was -0.5 cm H2O and 0.6 cm H2O, respectively. Adding resistance, increasing inspiratory flow but not EEP exaggerated this effect. All of the machines behaved similarly in this regard. Further, the performance of the NCPAP devices did not deteriorate after 6 hours of uninterrupted operation. We conclude that the second generation NCPAP machines may be interchanged without another laboratory trial to readjust the EEP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is considered the preferred medical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Because NCPAP exerts its beneficial effects by maintaining positive airway pressure, we proposed to test the ability of the newer "second generation" NCPAP machines to maintain a constant airway pressure during simulated breathing on a lung model. Each of the seven new NCPAP devices tested were examined under conditions of changing inspiratory flow, end expiratory pressure (EEP) and resistance added to the patient end of the NCPAP hose. During inspiration airway pressure fell and in expiration it increased relative to the EEP in all machines. Using the standard NCPAP hose and a breathing pattern consistent with normal breathing during sleep, the maximum decline in pressure during simulated inspiration and excess pressure during simulated expiration was -0.5 cm H2O and 0.6 cm H2O, respectively. Adding resistance, increasing inspiratory flow but not EEP exaggerated this effect. All of the machines behaved similarly in this regard. Further, the performance of the NCPAP devices did not deteriorate after 6 hours of uninterrupted operation. We conclude that the second generation NCPAP machines may be interchanged without another laboratory trial to readjust the EEP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is considered the preferred medical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Because NCPAP exerts its beneficial effects by maintaining positive airway pressure, we proposed to test the ability of the newer "second generation" NCPAP machines to maintain a constant airway pressure during simulated breathing on a lung model. Each of the seven new NCPAP devices tested were examined under conditions of changing inspiratory flow, end expiratory pressure (EEP) and resistance added to the patient end of the NCPAP hose. During inspiration airway pressure fell and in expiration it increased relative to the EEP in all machines. Using the standard NCPAP hose and a breathing pattern consistent with normal breathing during sleep, the maximum decline in pressure during simulated inspiration and excess pressure during simulated expiration was -0.5 cm H2O and 0.6 cm H2O, respectively. Adding resistance, increasing inspiratory flow but not EEP exaggerated this effect. All of the machines behaved similarly in this regard. Further, the performance of the NCPAP devices did not deteriorate after 6 hours of uninterrupted operation. We conclude that the second generation NCPAP machines may be interchanged without another laboratory trial to readjust the EEP.

Key concepts: Continuous positive airway pressure, Expiration, Positive pressure, Anesthesia, Medicine, Airway, Apnea, Obstructive sleep apnea

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Second Generation of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices. Are They Created Equal? — Research Paper | ScholarLens