1978PubMedRequires access

[Duodenal ulcer therapy with cimetidine. A clinical endoscopic study in 76 patients (author's transl)].

G Dobrilla, M Valentini, M. Filippini, Mildred Felder, Bonoldi Mc, E. Moroder

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

34 patients were treated with cimetidine and placebo in a double blind trial and 42 were treated with cimetidine alone. Criteria investigated were the pain response, consumption of antacids when required and especially the endoscopically demonstrated scarring of the duodenal ulcer. Compared with placebo, cimetidine is capable of soothing pain and also reducing the consumption of antacids more quickly and to a greater extent. The differences are statistically significant. Complete anatomical healing of the ulcer was established in the double blind study in 80% of the patients in the cimetidine group and in 40% of the placebo group. Similar results were also shown in the group which received cimetidine alone.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

34 patients were treated with cimetidine and placebo in a double blind trial and 42 were treated with cimetidine alone. Criteria investigated were the pain response, consumption of antacids when required and especially the endoscopically demonstrated scarring of the duodenal ulcer. Compared with placebo, cimetidine is capable of soothing pain and also reducing the consumption of antacids more quickly and to a greater extent. The differences are statistically significant. Complete anatomical healing of the ulcer was established in the double blind study in 80% of the patients in the cimetidine group and in 40% of the placebo group. Similar results were also shown in the group which received cimetidine alone.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

34 patients were treated with cimetidine and placebo in a double blind trial and 42 were treated with cimetidine alone. Criteria investigated were the pain response, consumption of antacids when required and especially the endoscopically demonstrated scarring of the duodenal ulcer. Compared with placebo, cimetidine is capable of soothing pain and also reducing the consumption of antacids more quickly and to a greater extent. The differences are statistically significant. Complete anatomical healing of the ulcer was established in the double blind study in 80% of the patients in the cimetidine group and in 40% of the placebo group. Similar results were also shown in the group which received cimetidine alone.

Key concepts: Cimetidine, Placebo, Medicine, Duodenal ulcer, Placebo group, Double blind, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Duodenal ulcer therapy with cimetidine. A clinical endoscopic study in 76 patients (author's transl)]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens