1982PubMedRequires access

Endoscopic findings after antacid, cimetidine and placebo for peptic ulcer--importance of staging the lesions.

Salgado Ja, de Oliveira Ca, Lima Júnior Gf, Castro Lde P

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Ninety four adult outpatients entered a randomized trial in which 30 patients were treated openly with antacid hourly and 64 patients with a double-blind regimen of either cimetidine (1 g/day) or placebo. After 4 weeks, 66.3% of the antacid-treated patients, 56.2% of the cimetidine-treated patients and 9.4% of the placebo patients showed ulcer healing. The difference between cimetidine and antacid was not statistically significant. The low percentage in the placebo group as compared to other trials may be attributed to the avoidance of supplementary antacid in this group and or to the criterion of staging the lesions both for entry into study and for evaluating the results.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ninety four adult outpatients entered a randomized trial in which 30 patients were treated openly with antacid hourly and 64 patients with a double-blind regimen of either cimetidine (1 g/day) or placebo. After 4 weeks, 66.3% of the antacid-treated patients, 56.2% of the cimetidine-treated patients and 9.4% of the placebo patients showed ulcer healing. The difference between cimetidine and antacid was not statistically significant. The low percentage in the placebo group as compared to other trials may be attributed to the avoidance of supplementary antacid in this group and or to the criterion of staging the lesions both for entry into study and for evaluating the results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ninety four adult outpatients entered a randomized trial in which 30 patients were treated openly with antacid hourly and 64 patients with a double-blind regimen of either cimetidine (1 g/day) or placebo. After 4 weeks, 66.3% of the antacid-treated patients, 56.2% of the cimetidine-treated patients and 9.4% of the placebo patients showed ulcer healing. The difference between cimetidine and antacid was not statistically significant. The low percentage in the placebo group as compared to other trials may be attributed to the avoidance of supplementary antacid in this group and or to the criterion of staging the lesions both for entry into study and for evaluating the results.

Key concepts: Antacid, Medicine, Cimetidine, Placebo, Regimen, Peptic ulcer, Gastroenterology, Placebo group

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Endoscopic findings after antacid, cimetidine and placebo for peptic ulcer--importance of staging the lesions. — Research Paper | ScholarLens