2005•Journal of the American Psychoanalytic AssociationRequires access

Gender in Linear and Nonlinear History

Adrienne Harris

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

In response to Helen Gediman's notion of premodern, modern, and postmodern eras in the study of gender, an argument is made for a non-linear approach to this history and for situating it in the context of other historical developments-social, personal, intellectual, and institutional. Differences among modern and postmodern positions in the matter of the role of the body and of social construction are discussed. The impact of transgender and intersex communities and voices on psychoanalytic thinking is examined, as are the elements of intergenerational transmission of trauma on gender experience both conscious and unconscious.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In response to Helen Gediman's notion of premodern, modern, and postmodern eras in the study of gender, an argument is made for a non-linear approach to this history and for situating it in the context of other historical developments-social, personal, intellectual, and institutional. Differences among modern and postmodern positions in the matter of the role of the body and of social construction are discussed. The impact of transgender and intersex communities and voices on psychoanalytic thinking is examined, as are the elements of intergenerational transmission of trauma on gender experience both conscious and unconscious.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In response to Helen Gediman's notion of premodern, modern, and postmodern eras in the study of gender, an argument is made for a non-linear approach to this history and for situating it in the context of other historical developments-social, personal, intellectual, and institutional. Differences among modern and postmodern positions in the matter of the role of the body and of social construction are discussed. The impact of transgender and intersex communities and voices on psychoanalytic thinking is examined, as are the elements of intergenerational transmission of trauma on gender experience both conscious and unconscious.

Key concepts: Postmodernism, Psychoanalytic theory, Argument (complex analysis), Context (archaeology), Sociology, Unconscious mind, Gender studies, Psychoanalysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gender in Linear and Nonlinear History — Research Paper | ScholarLens