Gender in Linear and Nonlinear History
Adrienne Harris
Abstract
Adrienne Harris
Abstract
In response to Helen Gediman's notion of premodern, modern, and postmodern eras in the study of gender, an argument is made for a non-linear approach to this history and for situating it in the context of other historical developments-social, personal, intellectual, and institutional. Differences among modern and postmodern positions in the matter of the role of the body and of social construction are discussed. The impact of transgender and intersex communities and voices on psychoanalytic thinking is examined, as are the elements of intergenerational transmission of trauma on gender experience both conscious and unconscious.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In response to Helen Gediman's notion of premodern, modern, and postmodern eras in the study of gender, an argument is made for a non-linear approach to this history and for situating it in the context of other historical developments-social, personal, intellectual, and institutional. Differences among modern and postmodern positions in the matter of the role of the body and of social construction are discussed. The impact of transgender and intersex communities and voices on psychoanalytic thinking is examined, as are the elements of intergenerational transmission of trauma on gender experience both conscious and unconscious.
Key concepts: Postmodernism, Psychoanalytic theory, Argument (complex analysis), Context (archaeology), Sociology, Unconscious mind, Gender studies, Psychoanalysis