[In vitro activity of new quinolones against Mycoplasma pathogenic to humans].
Hélène Renaudin, Claudine Quentin, B de Barbeyrac, Cécile Marie Bébéar
Abstract
Hélène Renaudin, Claudine Quentin, B de Barbeyrac, Cécile Marie Bébéar
Abstract
The in vitro activity of new quinolones was evaluated against Mycoplasma pneumoniae (10 strains) and Mycoplasma hominis (approximately equal to 70 strains) by agar dilution, and against Ureaplasma urealyticum (approximately equal to 115 strains) by broth dilution. The static effect of pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin was investigated for all the strains. Rosoxacin was included in the tests for U. urealyticum and M. hominis. Pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and enoxacin were within the same range of sensitivity for M. pneumoniae; the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the 10 strains were 1 mg/l for ciprofloxacin, 2 mg/l for pefloxacin, MICs range was (0.05-1 mg/l) for ofloxacin and (0.5-4 mg/l) for enoxacin. Ciprofloxacin was the most active compound against M. hominis; MICs range and mode MICs were respectively in mg/l: (0.1-1) 0.5 for ciprofloxacin, (0.2-2) 0.5 for ofloxacin, (0.5-2) 1 for pefloxacin, (0.5-8) 2 for enoxacin, (2-16) 2 for rosoxacin. Ofloxacin was the most active compound against U. urealyticum; MICs range and mode MICs were respectively in mg/l: (0.2-2) 1 for ofloxacin, (0.1-8) 2 for rosoxacin, (0.5-8) 4 for pefloxacin, (1-16) 4 for ciprofloxacin, (2-32) 8 for enoxacin. No difference could be observed between tetracycline sensitive or resistant strains.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The in vitro activity of new quinolones was evaluated against Mycoplasma pneumoniae (10 strains) and Mycoplasma hominis (approximately equal to 70 strains) by agar dilution, and against Ureaplasma urealyticum (approximately equal to 115 strains) by broth dilution. The static effect of pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin was investigated for all the strains. Rosoxacin was included in the tests for U. urealyticum and M. hominis. Pefloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and enoxacin were within the same range of sensitivity for M. pneumoniae; the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the 10 strains were 1 mg/l for ciprofloxacin, 2 mg/l for pefloxacin, MICs range was (0.05-1 mg/l) for ofloxacin and (0.5-4 mg/l) for enoxacin. Ciprofloxacin was the most active compound against M. hominis; MICs range and mode MICs were respectively in mg/l: (0.1-1) 0.5 for ciprofloxacin, (0.2-2) 0.5 for ofloxacin, (0.5-2) 1 for pefloxacin, (0.5-8) 2 for enoxacin, (2-16) 2 for rosoxacin. Ofloxacin was the most active compound against U. urealyticum; MICs range and mode MICs were respectively in mg/l: (0.2-2) 1 for ofloxacin, (0.1-8) 2 for rosoxacin, (0.5-8) 4 for pefloxacin, (1-16) 4 for ciprofloxacin, (2-32) 8 for enoxacin. No difference could be observed between tetracycline sensitive or resistant strains.
Key concepts: Pefloxacin, Ofloxacin, Enoxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Microbiology, Mycoplasma hominis, Agar dilution, Antibacterial agent