1992Neurological ResearchRequires access

Retraction brain ischaemia: Mannitol plus nimodipine preserves both cerebral blood flow and evoked potentials during normoventilation and hyperventilation

Russell J. Andrews, Robin P. Muto

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

In our miniature swine model simulating operating room brain retraction, we investigated the effects of mannitol plus nimodipine on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and evoked potentials (EP) ipsilateral and contralateral to retraction, in comparison with either agent alone, during both normoventilation and hyperventilation. We here report results in 27 animals with intravenous mannitol (2 g kg-1 over 15 min) and/or nimodipine (1 microgram kg-1 min-1 constant infusion). Mannitol plus nimodipine was superior both to controls and to either mannitol alone or nimodipine alone in preserving EP amplitude ipsilateral to retraction during both normoventilation and hyperventilation. Mannitol alone was effective in normoventilation at preserving EP, while nimodipine alone was effective in hyperventilation. No significant asymmetries in CBF or EP were seen with mannitol plus nimodipine in either normoventilation or hyperventilation. By five minutes postretraction CBF had returned to preretraction values for all groups, and EP amplitude had returned also except for hyperventilated controls. In this model of brain retraction, mannitol plus nimodipine is superior to either agent alone in maintaining both CBF and EP when normoventilation and hyperventilation are employed. The results are discussed in terms of the possible mechanisms for the different and complementary effects of mannitol and nimodipine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In our miniature swine model simulating operating room brain retraction, we investigated the effects of mannitol plus nimodipine on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and evoked potentials (EP) ipsilateral and contralateral to retraction, in comparison with either agent alone, during both normoventilation and hyperventilation. We here report results in 27 animals with intravenous mannitol (2 g kg-1 over 15 min) and/or nimodipine (1 microgram kg-1 min-1 constant infusion). Mannitol plus nimodipine was superior both to controls and to either mannitol alone or nimodipine alone in preserving EP amplitude ipsilateral to retraction during both normoventilation and hyperventilation. Mannitol alone was effective in normoventilation at preserving EP, while nimodipine alone was effective in hyperventilation. No significant asymmetries in CBF or EP were seen with mannitol plus nimodipine in either normoventilation or hyperventilation. By five minutes postretraction CBF had returned to preretraction values for all groups, and EP amplitude had returned also except for hyperventilated controls. In this model of brain retraction, mannitol plus nimodipine is superior to either agent alone in maintaining both CBF and EP when normoventilation and hyperventilation are employed. The results are discussed in terms of the possible mechanisms for the different and complementary effects of mannitol and nimodipine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In our miniature swine model simulating operating room brain retraction, we investigated the effects of mannitol plus nimodipine on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and evoked potentials (EP) ipsilateral and contralateral to retraction, in comparison with either agent alone, during both normoventilation and hyperventilation. We here report results in 27 animals with intravenous mannitol (2 g kg-1 over 15 min) and/or nimodipine (1 microgram kg-1 min-1 constant infusion). Mannitol plus nimodipine was superior both to controls and to either mannitol alone or nimodipine alone in preserving EP amplitude ipsilateral to retraction during both normoventilation and hyperventilation. Mannitol alone was effective in normoventilation at preserving EP, while nimodipine alone was effective in hyperventilation. No significant asymmetries in CBF or EP were seen with mannitol plus nimodipine in either normoventilation or hyperventilation. By five minutes postretraction CBF had returned to preretraction values for all groups, and EP amplitude had returned also except for hyperventilated controls. In this model of brain retraction, mannitol plus nimodipine is superior to either agent alone in maintaining both CBF and EP when normoventilation and hyperventilation are employed. The results are discussed in terms of the possible mechanisms for the different and complementary effects of mannitol and nimodipine.

Key concepts: Hyperventilation, Nimodipine, Mannitol, Cerebral blood flow, Anesthesia, Medicine, Ischemia, Cerebral ischaemia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retraction brain ischaemia: Mannitol plus nimodipine preserves both cerebral blood flow and evoked potentials during normoventilation and hyperventilation — Research Paper | ScholarLens