2008•PubMedRequires access

Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who meet the Milan criteria.

Hiroshi Ishii, Junji Furuse, Taira Kinoshitá, Masaru Konishi, Toshio Nakagohri, Shinichiro Takahashi, Naoto Gotohda, Kohei Nakachi, Eiichiro Suzuki, Masahiro Yoshino

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although hepatocellular carcinoma patients who meet the Milan criteria are optimal candidates for liver transplantation, most such patients in Japan have been treated without liver transplantation. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective analysis, the patient selection criteria were (1) admission between 1992 and 2005, (2) fulfillment of the Milan criteria, (3) classification within the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages A1-A4, and (4) no previous anticancer treatment. RESULTS: Of 451 patients who met the selection criteria, 162 underwent hepatectomy. The proportion of patients who underwent hepatectomy was 58% of 106 with stage A1 and 29% of 345 with stages A2-A4. For patients with stages A2-A4, the survival probability after hepatectomy at 3, 5, and 7 years was 89%, 70%, and 61%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival time between stages A1 and stages A2-A4 after hepatectomy. Among patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5 and 6 in stages A2-A4, 51% and 29% underwent hepatectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy may be an appropriate first-line treatment option for patients with stages A2-A4 who meet the Milan criteria, when they have a good hepatic reserve and a long waiting time for liver transplantation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although hepatocellular carcinoma patients who meet the Milan criteria are optimal candidates for liver transplantation, most such patients in Japan have been treated without liver transplantation. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective analysis, the patient selection criteria were (1) admission between 1992 and 2005, (2) fulfillment of the Milan criteria, (3) classification within the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages A1-A4, and (4) no previous anticancer treatment. RESULTS: Of 451 patients who met the selection criteria, 162 underwent hepatectomy. The proportion of patients who underwent hepatectomy was 58% of 106 with stage A1 and 29% of 345 with stages A2-A4. For patients with stages A2-A4, the survival probability after hepatectomy at 3, 5, and 7 years was 89%, 70%, and 61%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival time between stages A1 and stages A2-A4 after hepatectomy. Among patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5 and 6 in stages A2-A4, 51% and 29% underwent hepatectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy may be an appropriate first-line treatment option for patients with stages A2-A4 who meet the Milan criteria, when they have a good hepatic reserve and a long waiting time for liver transplantation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although hepatocellular carcinoma patients who meet the Milan criteria are optimal candidates for liver transplantation, most such patients in Japan have been treated without liver transplantation. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective analysis, the patient selection criteria were (1) admission between 1992 and 2005, (2) fulfillment of the Milan criteria, (3) classification within the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages A1-A4, and (4) no previous anticancer treatment. RESULTS: Of 451 patients who met the selection criteria, 162 underwent hepatectomy. The proportion of patients who underwent hepatectomy was 58% of 106 with stage A1 and 29% of 345 with stages A2-A4. For patients with stages A2-A4, the survival probability after hepatectomy at 3, 5, and 7 years was 89%, 70%, and 61%, respectively. There were no significant differences in survival time between stages A1 and stages A2-A4 after hepatectomy. Among patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5 and 6 in stages A2-A4, 51% and 29% underwent hepatectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy may be an appropriate first-line treatment option for patients with stages A2-A4 who meet the Milan criteria, when they have a good hepatic reserve and a long waiting time for liver transplantation.

Key concepts: Hepatectomy, Medicine, Milan criteria, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver transplantation, Stage (stratigraphy), Liver cancer, Surgery

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who meet the Milan criteria. — Research Paper | ScholarLens