2003•PubMedRequires access

[The value of the pulmonary-artery catheter: not ruled out, but not proven either].

Evert de Jonge, Erik Jan van Lieshout, M B Vroom

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A number of prospective, randomized trials have recently been published on the effects of using the pulmonary artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter in the peri-operative management of high-risk patients and in the treatment of critically ill patients on the intensive-care unit. These studies show that using the pulmonary-artery catheter does not lead to increased survival. It cannot be excluded that more beneficial effects would have been found with other treatment goals, or if different populations had been studied. However, based on the present evidence from the literature, the routine use of the pulmonary-artery catheter can no longer be defended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of prospective, randomized trials have recently been published on the effects of using the pulmonary artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter in the peri-operative management of high-risk patients and in the treatment of critically ill patients on the intensive-care unit. These studies show that using the pulmonary-artery catheter does not lead to increased survival. It cannot be excluded that more beneficial effects would have been found with other treatment goals, or if different populations had been studied. However, based on the present evidence from the literature, the routine use of the pulmonary-artery catheter can no longer be defended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of prospective, randomized trials have recently been published on the effects of using the pulmonary artery (Swan-Ganz) catheter in the peri-operative management of high-risk patients and in the treatment of critically ill patients on the intensive-care unit. These studies show that using the pulmonary-artery catheter does not lead to increased survival. It cannot be excluded that more beneficial effects would have been found with other treatment goals, or if different populations had been studied. However, based on the present evidence from the literature, the routine use of the pulmonary-artery catheter can no longer be defended.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pulmonary artery catheter, Catheter, Pulmonary artery, Intensive care unit, Critically ill, Randomized controlled trial, Artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The value of the pulmonary-artery catheter: not ruled out, but not proven either]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens