1987PubMedRequires access

[Clinical aspects and differential diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus].

Peter Kind, Guenter Goerz

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

On the basis of LE cases treated at the Department of Dermatology, Düsseldorf University, during the last few years, we present the various forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). 72% of the patients showed discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), whereas disseminated discoid LE (DDLE) and lupus panniculitis were found in 3% each. Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET), as well, must be regarded as exceptional. Subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and systemic LE (SLE) showed nearly similar frequency (10 and 12%, resp.). Bullous LE is also very rare and must be considered a variant of SLE. The various forms of cutaneous LE can be differentiated according to clinical presentation and histopathology. Direct immunofluorescence, in contrast, has but limited diagnostic value, except with lesions on the scalp. Exact classification of cutaneous LE is the more essential, as it implies considerable therapeutic and prognostic consequences for the patient.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On the basis of LE cases treated at the Department of Dermatology, Düsseldorf University, during the last few years, we present the various forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). 72% of the patients showed discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), whereas disseminated discoid LE (DDLE) and lupus panniculitis were found in 3% each. Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET), as well, must be regarded as exceptional. Subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and systemic LE (SLE) showed nearly similar frequency (10 and 12%, resp.). Bullous LE is also very rare and must be considered a variant of SLE. The various forms of cutaneous LE can be differentiated according to clinical presentation and histopathology. Direct immunofluorescence, in contrast, has but limited diagnostic value, except with lesions on the scalp. Exact classification of cutaneous LE is the more essential, as it implies considerable therapeutic and prognostic consequences for the patient.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On the basis of LE cases treated at the Department of Dermatology, Düsseldorf University, during the last few years, we present the various forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). 72% of the patients showed discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), whereas disseminated discoid LE (DDLE) and lupus panniculitis were found in 3% each. Lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET), as well, must be regarded as exceptional. Subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and systemic LE (SLE) showed nearly similar frequency (10 and 12%, resp.). Bullous LE is also very rare and must be considered a variant of SLE. The various forms of cutaneous LE can be differentiated according to clinical presentation and histopathology. Direct immunofluorescence, in contrast, has but limited diagnostic value, except with lesions on the scalp. Exact classification of cutaneous LE is the more essential, as it implies considerable therapeutic and prognostic consequences for the patient.

Key concepts: Discoid lupus erythematosus, Medicine, Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Dermatology, Lupus erythematosus, Scalp, Differential diagnosis, Histopathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Clinical aspects and differential diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens