[Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of using terazosin and tamsulosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia].
Lopatkin Na, Sivkov Av, Surikov Vn, Egorov Aa
Abstract
Lopatkin Na, Sivkov Av, Surikov Vn, Egorov Aa
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of terazosin vs tamsulosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); to elucidate effectiveness of the use of tamsulosin followed by terazosin and vice versa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Group 1 of BPH patients received terazosin (5 mg/day) followed in a month by tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day). Group 2 received the same drug in the opposite sequence. The trial included 60 patients with symptoms of the lower urinary tracts due to BPH. The results were assessed on the treatment day 5-7, 14, 30 and 60 one month after the treatment termination. RESULTS: Terazosin and tamsulosin relieved clinical symptoms, reduced QOL and Qmax. One month after the treatment the symptoms partially returned to baseline, Qmax returned completely. In cross-over, positive trends were weaker. CONCLUSION: Clinical efficiency of both drugs was comparable, there was no cross effect. A month interval between the treatments in this case was insufficient. This should be taken into account when planning further studies.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of terazosin vs tamsulosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); to elucidate effectiveness of the use of tamsulosin followed by terazosin and vice versa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Group 1 of BPH patients received terazosin (5 mg/day) followed in a month by tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day). Group 2 received the same drug in the opposite sequence. The trial included 60 patients with symptoms of the lower urinary tracts due to BPH. The results were assessed on the treatment day 5-7, 14, 30 and 60 one month after the treatment termination. RESULTS: Terazosin and tamsulosin relieved clinical symptoms, reduced QOL and Qmax. One month after the treatment the symptoms partially returned to baseline, Qmax returned completely. In cross-over, positive trends were weaker. CONCLUSION: Clinical efficiency of both drugs was comparable, there was no cross effect. A month interval between the treatments in this case was insufficient. This should be taken into account when planning further studies.
Key concepts: Tamsulosin, Terazosin, Medicine, Urology, Hyperplasia, Internal medicine