2007Unpublished venueRequires access

The Validity and Reliability of Brief Rating Scales for the Assessment of Symptoms and Functions in Patients with Psychosis

Jin Yong Kim, Shi Hyun Kang, Soo Jung Kim, Kyung Hyun Kwak, Chang Yoon Kim

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Objective:This study aimed to validate the Clinical Global Impression 5-factor (CGI-5 factor) scale and Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), which are brief clinical global scales to assess the psychological symptoms and psychosocial functioning in patients with psychosis. Methods:The CGI-5 factor scale is composed of 5 items:CGI-Positive, Negative, Depressive, Excitement, and Cognitive. Concurrent validity and sensitivity to change were evaluated by comparing the CGI-5 factor scale with Positive and Negative syndrome Scale (PANSS) 5-dimension. Concurrent validity of PSP was compared with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score and Psychosocial functioning (PSF) scales composed of selected items from Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Functional Analysis of Care Environments (FACE), and Social-Adaptive Functioning Evaluation (SAFE). A total of 63 inpatients were enrolled in this study. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, 20 patients were assessed by two investigators. Results:The correlations between the CGI-5 factor scale and PANSS were significant on admission (0.5070.86) were in moderate to substantial range. Conclusion:This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the CGI-5 factor scale and PSP. Given its simplicity and brevity, these can be used to evaluate global symptoms and psychosocial functioning of psychotic patients in routine clinical practice. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2007;46(5):492-498)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:This study aimed to validate the Clinical Global Impression 5-factor (CGI-5 factor) scale and Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), which are brief clinical global scales to assess the psychological symptoms and psychosocial functioning in patients with psychosis. Methods:The CGI-5 factor scale is composed of 5 items:CGI-Positive, Negative, Depressive, Excitement, and Cognitive. Concurrent validity and sensitivity to change were evaluated by comparing the CGI-5 factor scale with Positive and Negative syndrome Scale (PANSS) 5-dimension. Concurrent validity of PSP was compared with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score and Psychosocial functioning (PSF) scales composed of selected items from Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Functional Analysis of Care Environments (FACE), and Social-Adaptive Functioning Evaluation (SAFE). A total of 63 inpatients were enrolled in this study. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, 20 patients were assessed by two investigators. Results:The correlations between the CGI-5 factor scale and PANSS were significant on admission (0.5070.86) were in moderate to substantial range. Conclusion:This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the CGI-5 factor scale and PSP. Given its simplicity and brevity, these can be used to evaluate global symptoms and psychosocial functioning of psychotic patients in routine clinical practice. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2007;46(5):492-498)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:This study aimed to validate the Clinical Global Impression 5-factor (CGI-5 factor) scale and Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), which are brief clinical global scales to assess the psychological symptoms and psychosocial functioning in patients with psychosis. Methods:The CGI-5 factor scale is composed of 5 items:CGI-Positive, Negative, Depressive, Excitement, and Cognitive. Concurrent validity and sensitivity to change were evaluated by comparing the CGI-5 factor scale with Positive and Negative syndrome Scale (PANSS) 5-dimension. Concurrent validity of PSP was compared with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score and Psychosocial functioning (PSF) scales composed of selected items from Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Functional Analysis of Care Environments (FACE), and Social-Adaptive Functioning Evaluation (SAFE). A total of 63 inpatients were enrolled in this study. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, 20 patients were assessed by two investigators. Results:The correlations between the CGI-5 factor scale and PANSS were significant on admission (0.5070.86) were in moderate to substantial range. Conclusion:This study confirmed the validity and reliability of the CGI-5 factor scale and PSP. Given its simplicity and brevity, these can be used to evaluate global symptoms and psychosocial functioning of psychotic patients in routine clinical practice. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2007;46(5):492-498)

Key concepts: Global Assessment of Functioning, Clinical Global Impression, Concurrent validity, Psychology, Psychosocial, Clinical psychology, Rating scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Validity and Reliability of Brief Rating Scales for the Assessment of Symptoms and Functions in Patients with Psychosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens