National Pension Scheme: For Whose Benefit?
Ayanendu Sanyal, Gayithri Karnam, S. Erappa
Abstract
Ayanendu Sanyal, Gayithri Karnam, S. Erappa
Abstract
Pension reforms in India in the last decade have seen three major initiatives – a paradigmatic shift in the civil servants’ pension scheme, the National Pension Scheme (NaPS) for all citizens and the New Pension System Lite for the economically disadvantaged sections with small savings. The NaPS has seen a lukewarm response so far, with a majority of subscribers being central and state government employees, for whom the scheme is mandatory. An analysis of the auto choice option under the NaPS and the demographic transition reveals potential future imbalances in the investment structure among the asset classes. Moreover, the NaPS does not even guarantee a minimum pension, thus defeating its 'welfare' orientation.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Pension reforms in India in the last decade have seen three major initiatives – a paradigmatic shift in the civil servants’ pension scheme, the National Pension Scheme (NaPS) for all citizens and the New Pension System Lite for the economically disadvantaged sections with small savings. The NaPS has seen a lukewarm response so far, with a majority of subscribers being central and state government employees, for whom the scheme is mandatory. An analysis of the auto choice option under the NaPS and the demographic transition reveals potential future imbalances in the investment structure among the asset classes. Moreover, the NaPS does not even guarantee a minimum pension, thus defeating its 'welfare' orientation.
Key concepts: Pension, Disadvantaged, National Pension, Welfare, Investment (military), Asset (computer security), Civil servants, Government (linguistics)