1995•PubMedRequires access

Ensuring equity and quality of care for elderly people: a critique of the College report.

Shaw Ab

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Rationing methods which discriminate against patients on account of their age can be ethical. Sometimes the young and sometimes the old should be favoured. It may depend on who benefits most and whether the rationing is by waiting list or by the exclusion of individuals. Equality is not equity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rationing methods which discriminate against patients on account of their age can be ethical. Sometimes the young and sometimes the old should be favoured. It may depend on who benefits most and whether the rationing is by waiting list or by the exclusion of individuals. Equality is not equity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rationing methods which discriminate against patients on account of their age can be ethical. Sometimes the young and sometimes the old should be favoured. It may depend on who benefits most and whether the rationing is by waiting list or by the exclusion of individuals. Equality is not equity.

Key concepts: Rationing, Equity (law), Health care rationing, Actuarial science, Quality (philosophy), Public economics, Psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ensuring equity and quality of care for elderly people: a critique of the College report. — Research Paper | ScholarLens