1994PubMedRequires access

[Midazolam and lorazepam as premedication. A randomized double-blind study].

C Bredahl, Lone Knudsen, Pia Stjernholm, Hans Mandøe, C Grevy, L Kirkegaard, Steve Jensen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Oral administration of midazolam and lorazepam as premedication was compared in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Eighty patients scheduled for minor gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia and 80 patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty in spinal anaesthesia were included. Assessments were: 1. patients subjective evaluation of the premedication, 2. sedation scale, 3. recovery of cognitive function assessed by Simple Paper-and-Pencil test and Postbox test, 4. amnesic effects. In the general anaesthesia group midazolam caused less postoperative sedation, less postoperative amnesia and cognitive function returned more rapidly. In the spinal anaesthesia group cognitive function returned more rapidly after midazolam. Midazolam should be preferred for premedication if rapid recovery is desired.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Oral administration of midazolam and lorazepam as premedication was compared in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Eighty patients scheduled for minor gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia and 80 patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty in spinal anaesthesia were included. Assessments were: 1. patients subjective evaluation of the premedication, 2. sedation scale, 3. recovery of cognitive function assessed by Simple Paper-and-Pencil test and Postbox test, 4. amnesic effects. In the general anaesthesia group midazolam caused less postoperative sedation, less postoperative amnesia and cognitive function returned more rapidly. In the spinal anaesthesia group cognitive function returned more rapidly after midazolam. Midazolam should be preferred for premedication if rapid recovery is desired.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Oral administration of midazolam and lorazepam as premedication was compared in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Eighty patients scheduled for minor gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia and 80 patients scheduled for hip arthroplasty in spinal anaesthesia were included. Assessments were: 1. patients subjective evaluation of the premedication, 2. sedation scale, 3. recovery of cognitive function assessed by Simple Paper-and-Pencil test and Postbox test, 4. amnesic effects. In the general anaesthesia group midazolam caused less postoperative sedation, less postoperative amnesia and cognitive function returned more rapidly. In the spinal anaesthesia group cognitive function returned more rapidly after midazolam. Midazolam should be preferred for premedication if rapid recovery is desired.

Key concepts: Premedication, Midazolam, Anesthesia, Sedation, Medicine, Amnesia, Lorazepam, General anaesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Midazolam and lorazepam as premedication. A randomized double-blind study]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens