[The efficacy of smectite in acute infantile diarrhea, compared to a placebo and loperamide].
Brigitte Gilbert, Anne Lienhardt, S Palomera, Luigi Barberis, Daniel Tormo Borreda
Abstract
Brigitte Gilbert, Anne Lienhardt, S Palomera, Luigi Barberis, Daniel Tormo Borreda
Abstract
Fifty-six infants (aged 2 months to two years) with moderate to severe diarrhea were entered in a comparative therapeutic trial of smectite versus placebo or loperamide. Results showed that diarrhea resolved faster under smectite than under placebo and at least as fast under smectite as under loperamide. Tolerance of smectite is excellent as a result of the lack of any effect on intestinal motility.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fifty-six infants (aged 2 months to two years) with moderate to severe diarrhea were entered in a comparative therapeutic trial of smectite versus placebo or loperamide. Results showed that diarrhea resolved faster under smectite than under placebo and at least as fast under smectite as under loperamide. Tolerance of smectite is excellent as a result of the lack of any effect on intestinal motility.
Key concepts: Loperamide, Diarrhea, Medicine, Placebo, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Pathology, Alternative medicine