2013PubMedRequires access

Usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for type I gastric carcinoid tumors compared with endoscopic mucosal resection.

Yuichi Sato, Manabu Takeuchi, Satoru Hashimoto, Ken‐ichi Mizuno, M. Kobayashi, Mitsuya Iwafuchi, Rintaro Narisawa, Yutaka Aoyagi

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastric carcinoid tumors (GCTs) often extends into the submucosa, and are therefore difficult to resect completely by using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of submucosal gastrointestinal lesions. Therefore, ESD may be a feasible method for complete resection of GCT. Our purpose is to clarify the usefulness of ESD for treatment of type I GCT. METHODOLOGY: Between 1998 and 2011, EMR or ESD was performed for 13 lesions in 12 patients with type I GCTs. Among the 13 GCTs, 6 were resected using EMR, and 7 were removed using ESD. RESULTS: All lesions were histologically classified as Grade 1. The depth of invasion was the mucosa for 1 lesion and the submucosa for 12 lesions. The horizontal margins of excision were negative for all lesions; however, the vertical margins were positive in 4 lesions (66.7%) in the EMR group and no lesions (0%) in the ESD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that ESD for small type I GCT is better to achieve complete resection than conventional EMR. ESD would be an effective technique for the treatment of small type I GCT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastric carcinoid tumors (GCTs) often extends into the submucosa, and are therefore difficult to resect completely by using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of submucosal gastrointestinal lesions. Therefore, ESD may be a feasible method for complete resection of GCT. Our purpose is to clarify the usefulness of ESD for treatment of type I GCT. METHODOLOGY: Between 1998 and 2011, EMR or ESD was performed for 13 lesions in 12 patients with type I GCTs. Among the 13 GCTs, 6 were resected using EMR, and 7 were removed using ESD. RESULTS: All lesions were histologically classified as Grade 1. The depth of invasion was the mucosa for 1 lesion and the submucosa for 12 lesions. The horizontal margins of excision were negative for all lesions; however, the vertical margins were positive in 4 lesions (66.7%) in the EMR group and no lesions (0%) in the ESD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that ESD for small type I GCT is better to achieve complete resection than conventional EMR. ESD would be an effective technique for the treatment of small type I GCT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastric carcinoid tumors (GCTs) often extends into the submucosa, and are therefore difficult to resect completely by using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of submucosal gastrointestinal lesions. Therefore, ESD may be a feasible method for complete resection of GCT. Our purpose is to clarify the usefulness of ESD for treatment of type I GCT. METHODOLOGY: Between 1998 and 2011, EMR or ESD was performed for 13 lesions in 12 patients with type I GCTs. Among the 13 GCTs, 6 were resected using EMR, and 7 were removed using ESD. RESULTS: All lesions were histologically classified as Grade 1. The depth of invasion was the mucosa for 1 lesion and the submucosa for 12 lesions. The horizontal margins of excision were negative for all lesions; however, the vertical margins were positive in 4 lesions (66.7%) in the EMR group and no lesions (0%) in the ESD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that ESD for small type I GCT is better to achieve complete resection than conventional EMR. ESD would be an effective technique for the treatment of small type I GCT.

Key concepts: Submucosa, Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Endoscopic mucosal resection, Medicine, Lesion, Resection, Endoscopy, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for type I gastric carcinoid tumors compared with endoscopic mucosal resection. — Research Paper | ScholarLens