2013PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of two kinds of enzyme-linked immunosorbnent assay for detection of anti-hepatitis C].

Long-You Zhao, Yongping Ji, Wang De-bin, Jie Zhuang, Bin Zhou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of sensitivity and specificity on the results of the same samples determined by indirect ELISA and sandwich ELISA. METHODS: A 51 anti-HCV positive serum samples obtained from donors were screened by two indirect ELISA kits initially, and then were detected using one sandwich ELISA kit, and were confirmed by recombinent immunoblot assay (RIBA) and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: To compared with HCV-RNA, false positive rate of two kinds of indirect ELISA and one sandwich ELISA was 40.9%, 59.1% and 2.2% respectively. The positive rates of them were 100%, but the analytical sensitivity of sandwich ELISA was more than indirect ELISA 2 to 6 times. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of sandwich ELISA was significantly better than those of indirect ELISA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of sensitivity and specificity on the results of the same samples determined by indirect ELISA and sandwich ELISA. METHODS: A 51 anti-HCV positive serum samples obtained from donors were screened by two indirect ELISA kits initially, and then were detected using one sandwich ELISA kit, and were confirmed by recombinent immunoblot assay (RIBA) and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: To compared with HCV-RNA, false positive rate of two kinds of indirect ELISA and one sandwich ELISA was 40.9%, 59.1% and 2.2% respectively. The positive rates of them were 100%, but the analytical sensitivity of sandwich ELISA was more than indirect ELISA 2 to 6 times. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of sandwich ELISA was significantly better than those of indirect ELISA.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference of sensitivity and specificity on the results of the same samples determined by indirect ELISA and sandwich ELISA. METHODS: A 51 anti-HCV positive serum samples obtained from donors were screened by two indirect ELISA kits initially, and then were detected using one sandwich ELISA kit, and were confirmed by recombinent immunoblot assay (RIBA) and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: To compared with HCV-RNA, false positive rate of two kinds of indirect ELISA and one sandwich ELISA was 40.9%, 59.1% and 2.2% respectively. The positive rates of them were 100%, but the analytical sensitivity of sandwich ELISA was more than indirect ELISA 2 to 6 times. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of sandwich ELISA was significantly better than those of indirect ELISA.

Key concepts: Virology, Molecular biology, Medicine, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of two kinds of enzyme-linked immunosorbnent assay for detection of anti-hepatitis C]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens