2010Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics SocietyRequires access

One Year Follow-up for Successfully Treated Children with Accommodative Dysfunction

Hoy Sun Shin, Do Jin Youk, Duk Yong Sung, Sang Chul Park, Sun Haeng Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term stability of the improved symptoms and accommodative functions after completion of accommodative therapy. Methods: Seven children (mean ageSD: years) who were successfully treated with a vision therapy program for either accommodative insufficiency or infacility were followed for 1 year. The visual symptoms of the subjects were measured by the College of Optometrists in Vision Development Quality of Life (COVD-QOL) checklist, and this was followed by measurement of the monocular and binocular accommodative facility with D flipper lens. Results: The mean visual symptoms at the 1 year follow-up examination () showed a small increase, but there was no significant difference (p=0.446) from post-therapy (). There was small regression in the monocular (left eye, ) and binocular () accommodative facility at the 1 year follow-up examination, but there were no significant different from the monocular (, p=0.147) and binocular (, p=0.066) accommodative facility measurements at post-therapy. Also, every subject met the normative values of cpm for monocular accommodative facility and cpm for binocular accommodative facility in the long-term. Conclusions: There was long-term maintenance of the improved visual symptoms and accommodative functions, and so it is clear that the positive therapeutic effects persist with accommodative therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term stability of the improved symptoms and accommodative functions after completion of accommodative therapy. Methods: Seven children (mean ageSD: years) who were successfully treated with a vision therapy program for either accommodative insufficiency or infacility were followed for 1 year. The visual symptoms of the subjects were measured by the College of Optometrists in Vision Development Quality of Life (COVD-QOL) checklist, and this was followed by measurement of the monocular and binocular accommodative facility with D flipper lens. Results: The mean visual symptoms at the 1 year follow-up examination () showed a small increase, but there was no significant difference (p=0.446) from post-therapy (). There was small regression in the monocular (left eye, ) and binocular () accommodative facility at the 1 year follow-up examination, but there were no significant different from the monocular (, p=0.147) and binocular (, p=0.066) accommodative facility measurements at post-therapy. Also, every subject met the normative values of cpm for monocular accommodative facility and cpm for binocular accommodative facility in the long-term. Conclusions: There was long-term maintenance of the improved visual symptoms and accommodative functions, and so it is clear that the positive therapeutic effects persist with accommodative therapy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term stability of the improved symptoms and accommodative functions after completion of accommodative therapy. Methods: Seven children (mean ageSD: years) who were successfully treated with a vision therapy program for either accommodative insufficiency or infacility were followed for 1 year. The visual symptoms of the subjects were measured by the College of Optometrists in Vision Development Quality of Life (COVD-QOL) checklist, and this was followed by measurement of the monocular and binocular accommodative facility with D flipper lens. Results: The mean visual symptoms at the 1 year follow-up examination () showed a small increase, but there was no significant difference (p=0.446) from post-therapy (). There was small regression in the monocular (left eye, ) and binocular () accommodative facility at the 1 year follow-up examination, but there were no significant different from the monocular (, p=0.147) and binocular (, p=0.066) accommodative facility measurements at post-therapy. Also, every subject met the normative values of cpm for monocular accommodative facility and cpm for binocular accommodative facility in the long-term. Conclusions: There was long-term maintenance of the improved visual symptoms and accommodative functions, and so it is clear that the positive therapeutic effects persist with accommodative therapy.

Key concepts: Monocular, Medicine, Optometry, Binocular vision, Accommodation, Monocular vision, Ophthalmology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
One Year Follow-up for Successfully Treated Children with Accommodative Dysfunction — Research Paper | ScholarLens