2014Unpublished venueOpen access

Case-based Reasoning for Experience-based Collaborative Risk Management

Nielsen Luiz Rechia Machado, Luís Alvaro de Lima Silva, Lisandra Manzoni Fontoura, John A. Campbell

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

In a collaborative risk management scenario, project stakeholders often need natural forms of recording and reusing past risk management experiences so that they could better assess whether there are threats to the goals of new projects. The contribution of this paper is to propose an enhanced case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to support project participants to exploit such experiences which are here expressed as collaborative risk management discussion cases. The paper shows how these debates are structured through the exploitation of a dialogue game protocol for risk management. Then, it discusses how users can utilize queries based on facts and arguments so that past risk discussion cases could be retrieved from a case base. Attention is also given to case-based explanation templates, which are relevant for the understanding of key moves of argumentation in debate trees recorded in such enhanced cases retrieved. To demonstrate the practical utility of this approach, a case study involving the collaborative experience-based risk management of a software project is discussed. Keywords-component: Case-Based Reasoning; Collaborative Risk Management Tool; Dialogue Game; Argumentation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a collaborative risk management scenario, project stakeholders often need natural forms of recording and reusing past risk management experiences so that they could better assess whether there are threats to the goals of new projects. The contribution of this paper is to propose an enhanced case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to support project participants to exploit such experiences which are here expressed as collaborative risk management discussion cases. The paper shows how these debates are structured through the exploitation of a dialogue game protocol for risk management. Then, it discusses how users can utilize queries based on facts and arguments so that past risk discussion cases could be retrieved from a case base. Attention is also given to case-based explanation templates, which are relevant for the understanding of key moves of argumentation in debate trees recorded in such enhanced cases retrieved. To demonstrate the practical utility of this approach, a case study involving the collaborative experience-based risk management of a software project is discussed. Keywords-component: Case-Based Reasoning; Collaborative Risk Management Tool; Dialogue Game; Argumentation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a collaborative risk management scenario, project stakeholders often need natural forms of recording and reusing past risk management experiences so that they could better assess whether there are threats to the goals of new projects. The contribution of this paper is to propose an enhanced case-based reasoning (CBR) approach to support project participants to exploit such experiences which are here expressed as collaborative risk management discussion cases. The paper shows how these debates are structured through the exploitation of a dialogue game protocol for risk management. Then, it discusses how users can utilize queries based on facts and arguments so that past risk discussion cases could be retrieved from a case base. Attention is also given to case-based explanation templates, which are relevant for the understanding of key moves of argumentation in debate trees recorded in such enhanced cases retrieved. To demonstrate the practical utility of this approach, a case study involving the collaborative experience-based risk management of a software project is discussed. Keywords-component: Case-Based Reasoning; Collaborative Risk Management Tool; Dialogue Game; Argumentation.

Key concepts: Argumentation theory, Computer science, Risk management, Case-based reasoning, Knowledge management, Protocol (science), Reuse, Component (thermodynamics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Case-based Reasoning for Experience-based Collaborative Risk Management — Research Paper | ScholarLens