2000PubMedRequires access

[Sitting position in the neurosurgery: the results of a questionnaire sent to neurosurgeons of medical colleges].

Hiroyuki Kida, Nobuhiro Nishikawa, Kyohei Matsunami, M Kawahito, Mineto Ota, S Miyao

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

We analyzed questionnaire on the sitting position among neurosurgeons. We sent questionnaire to 80 medical colleges in Japan and obtained response from 61 universities (76.3%). The sitting position surgery was performed in 7 institutions (11.5%) and was not in other 54 (88.5%). The first reason for not adopting the sitting position was "other position was good enough to perform the surgery" (44 institutions, 81%). This reason exceeded "objection from the anesthesiologist" (17 institutions, 31%). Twenty institutions (33%) adopted or wished to perform the surgery in sitting position, indicating that neurosurgeons still are interest in performing the sitting position surgery. But 6 institutions adopting the sitting position predicted that the sitting position would diminish in the future, and the sitting position surgery would decrease in number in Japan.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We analyzed questionnaire on the sitting position among neurosurgeons. We sent questionnaire to 80 medical colleges in Japan and obtained response from 61 universities (76.3%). The sitting position surgery was performed in 7 institutions (11.5%) and was not in other 54 (88.5%). The first reason for not adopting the sitting position was "other position was good enough to perform the surgery" (44 institutions, 81%). This reason exceeded "objection from the anesthesiologist" (17 institutions, 31%). Twenty institutions (33%) adopted or wished to perform the surgery in sitting position, indicating that neurosurgeons still are interest in performing the sitting position surgery. But 6 institutions adopting the sitting position predicted that the sitting position would diminish in the future, and the sitting position surgery would decrease in number in Japan.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We analyzed questionnaire on the sitting position among neurosurgeons. We sent questionnaire to 80 medical colleges in Japan and obtained response from 61 universities (76.3%). The sitting position surgery was performed in 7 institutions (11.5%) and was not in other 54 (88.5%). The first reason for not adopting the sitting position was "other position was good enough to perform the surgery" (44 institutions, 81%). This reason exceeded "objection from the anesthesiologist" (17 institutions, 31%). Twenty institutions (33%) adopted or wished to perform the surgery in sitting position, indicating that neurosurgeons still are interest in performing the sitting position surgery. But 6 institutions adopting the sitting position predicted that the sitting position would diminish in the future, and the sitting position surgery would decrease in number in Japan.

Key concepts: Sitting, Position (finance), Neurosurgery, Physical therapy, Medicine, Surgery, Business, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Sitting position in the neurosurgery: the results of a questionnaire sent to neurosurgeons of medical colleges]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens