1994PubMedRequires access

[The epiphyseal involvement of metaphyseal bone sarcomas in patients with fertile growth plates. A magnetic resonance assessment].

Spina, Pietro Torricelli, Nicola Montanari, Marco Manfrini, Piero Picci, Luca Sangiorgi, Renato Romagnoli

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The growth plate is thought to be capable of limiting tumor spread. To assess the presence and extent of epiphyseal involvement in bone tumors, the plain radiographs and the MR images of 41 patients with metaphyseal sarcoma and radiographically apparent growth plate were studied. The results were compared with surgical, microscopic and histologic findings. Histology demonstrated that in 3 patients the tumor did not reach the growth plate, in 25 the epiphysis was involved while in 13 cases the tumor reached the physis but did not spread to the epiphysis. In the latter group of patients, histology demonstrated a microinfiltration of the physis in 5 cases. Radiography and MR sensitivities were 77.2% and 100%, respectively, while specificity was 94% for both methods. Histology showed that the epiphysis was involved in 25/41 cases (61%) and the growth plate in 30/41 (73%). Our results show that the growth plate does not usually act as a barrier against tumor spread and that MRI is the diagnostic tool of choice in the assessment of epiphyseal spread in metaphyseal tumors even though it cannot detect growth plate microinfiltrations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The growth plate is thought to be capable of limiting tumor spread. To assess the presence and extent of epiphyseal involvement in bone tumors, the plain radiographs and the MR images of 41 patients with metaphyseal sarcoma and radiographically apparent growth plate were studied. The results were compared with surgical, microscopic and histologic findings. Histology demonstrated that in 3 patients the tumor did not reach the growth plate, in 25 the epiphysis was involved while in 13 cases the tumor reached the physis but did not spread to the epiphysis. In the latter group of patients, histology demonstrated a microinfiltration of the physis in 5 cases. Radiography and MR sensitivities were 77.2% and 100%, respectively, while specificity was 94% for both methods. Histology showed that the epiphysis was involved in 25/41 cases (61%) and the growth plate in 30/41 (73%). Our results show that the growth plate does not usually act as a barrier against tumor spread and that MRI is the diagnostic tool of choice in the assessment of epiphyseal spread in metaphyseal tumors even though it cannot detect growth plate microinfiltrations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The growth plate is thought to be capable of limiting tumor spread. To assess the presence and extent of epiphyseal involvement in bone tumors, the plain radiographs and the MR images of 41 patients with metaphyseal sarcoma and radiographically apparent growth plate were studied. The results were compared with surgical, microscopic and histologic findings. Histology demonstrated that in 3 patients the tumor did not reach the growth plate, in 25 the epiphysis was involved while in 13 cases the tumor reached the physis but did not spread to the epiphysis. In the latter group of patients, histology demonstrated a microinfiltration of the physis in 5 cases. Radiography and MR sensitivities were 77.2% and 100%, respectively, while specificity was 94% for both methods. Histology showed that the epiphysis was involved in 25/41 cases (61%) and the growth plate in 30/41 (73%). Our results show that the growth plate does not usually act as a barrier against tumor spread and that MRI is the diagnostic tool of choice in the assessment of epiphyseal spread in metaphyseal tumors even though it cannot detect growth plate microinfiltrations.

Key concepts: Epiphysis, Physis, Medicine, Metaphysis, Histology, Epiphyseal plate, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[The epiphyseal involvement of metaphyseal bone sarcomas in patients with fertile growth plates. A magnetic resonance assessment]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens