2008Coal Geology & ExplorationRequires access

Calculation methods for number of water pipes under mine storage-drainage system in Xiaqiao coal mine

Chengpeng Ling

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In Xiaqiao coal mine of Xuzhou Mining Group a large amount of water inflow from each level causes substantive expenses for drainage.Therefore,to save the drainage expenses,an under mine storage-drainage system is proposed to optimize the periods of drainage utilizing the electricity price difference between different periods.The calculation methods for underground pre-treatment including the calculation method for the number of probing and drainage holes and the hydraulics method are put forward based on the simple introduction of the under mine storage-drainage system.After two methods are compared and analyzed,it is found that the hydraulics method is closer to the drainage fact whereas the safe superfluity is not considered,and the calculation method for the number of probing and drainage holes is relative sketchy while the security coefficient is bigger.On application,two methods should be mutually validated and taking safe factors into account to make choice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Xiaqiao coal mine of Xuzhou Mining Group a large amount of water inflow from each level causes substantive expenses for drainage.Therefore,to save the drainage expenses,an under mine storage-drainage system is proposed to optimize the periods of drainage utilizing the electricity price difference between different periods.The calculation methods for underground pre-treatment including the calculation method for the number of probing and drainage holes and the hydraulics method are put forward based on the simple introduction of the under mine storage-drainage system.After two methods are compared and analyzed,it is found that the hydraulics method is closer to the drainage fact whereas the safe superfluity is not considered,and the calculation method for the number of probing and drainage holes is relative sketchy while the security coefficient is bigger.On application,two methods should be mutually validated and taking safe factors into account to make choice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Xiaqiao coal mine of Xuzhou Mining Group a large amount of water inflow from each level causes substantive expenses for drainage.Therefore,to save the drainage expenses,an under mine storage-drainage system is proposed to optimize the periods of drainage utilizing the electricity price difference between different periods.The calculation methods for underground pre-treatment including the calculation method for the number of probing and drainage holes and the hydraulics method are put forward based on the simple introduction of the under mine storage-drainage system.After two methods are compared and analyzed,it is found that the hydraulics method is closer to the drainage fact whereas the safe superfluity is not considered,and the calculation method for the number of probing and drainage holes is relative sketchy while the security coefficient is bigger.On application,two methods should be mutually validated and taking safe factors into account to make choice.

Key concepts: Drainage, Drainage system (geomorphology), Coal mining, Inflow, Xuzhou, Hydraulics, Water storage, Coal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Calculation methods for number of water pipes under mine storage-drainage system in Xiaqiao coal mine — Research Paper | ScholarLens