2008•Journal of Kunming UniversityRequires access

On Truth in the Field of Vision between Scientific Realism and Anti-realism

BI Fu-sheng

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The argument on truth between realism and anti-realism focuses on three aspects as following: First,whether the condition of turning statements into truth can be the standard for evaluating their significance? Second,is the corresponding or conform relation existed in the true value of the statements and the fact expressed by them? Third,is it still effective to judge the true value of the statements by the law of excluded middle and two-valued principle? To answer these three questions,positive answers are found in Realism,while negative ones in Anti-realism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The argument on truth between realism and anti-realism focuses on three aspects as following: First,whether the condition of turning statements into truth can be the standard for evaluating their significance? Second,is the corresponding or conform relation existed in the true value of the statements and the fact expressed by them? Third,is it still effective to judge the true value of the statements by the law of excluded middle and two-valued principle? To answer these three questions,positive answers are found in Realism,while negative ones in Anti-realism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The argument on truth between realism and anti-realism focuses on three aspects as following: First,whether the condition of turning statements into truth can be the standard for evaluating their significance? Second,is the corresponding or conform relation existed in the true value of the statements and the fact expressed by them? Third,is it still effective to judge the true value of the statements by the law of excluded middle and two-valued principle? To answer these three questions,positive answers are found in Realism,while negative ones in Anti-realism.

Key concepts: Realism, Epistemology, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophical realism, Relation (database), Value (mathematics), Philosophy, Scientific realism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Truth in the Field of Vision between Scientific Realism and Anti-realism — Research Paper | ScholarLens