On Truth in the Field of Vision between Scientific Realism and Anti-realism
BI Fu-sheng
Abstract
BI Fu-sheng
Abstract
The argument on truth between realism and anti-realism focuses on three aspects as following: First,whether the condition of turning statements into truth can be the standard for evaluating their significance? Second,is the corresponding or conform relation existed in the true value of the statements and the fact expressed by them? Third,is it still effective to judge the true value of the statements by the law of excluded middle and two-valued principle? To answer these three questions,positive answers are found in Realism,while negative ones in Anti-realism.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The argument on truth between realism and anti-realism focuses on three aspects as following: First,whether the condition of turning statements into truth can be the standard for evaluating their significance? Second,is the corresponding or conform relation existed in the true value of the statements and the fact expressed by them? Third,is it still effective to judge the true value of the statements by the law of excluded middle and two-valued principle? To answer these three questions,positive answers are found in Realism,while negative ones in Anti-realism.
Key concepts: Realism, Epistemology, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophical realism, Relation (database), Value (mathematics), Philosophy, Scientific realism