2003Di-Si Junyi Daxue xuebaoRequires access

Statistical analysis of the quality of medical records in outpatient service

Xiang Gao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the present situation of medical records in our outpatient service and to analyze the major factors influencing the quality of medical records in our outpatient service. METHODS: According to the standards of evaluating the quality of medical records in outpatient service, random sampling was made among 19 clinical departments of Xijing Hospital from July to October in the year of 2000. And the software SPLM was applied for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: 685 medical records out of the 730 ones were evaluated as the first rate (the score was no less than 85 points), with an average of 94.63. The well written medical records were written by senior doctors with higher professional titles, who were familiar with the rules of writing medical records and whose department set strict demands on them. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the quality of medical records in outpatient service, junior doctors and doctors here for further training should have specific training in writing medical records.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To evaluate the present situation of medical records in our outpatient service and to analyze the major factors influencing the quality of medical records in our outpatient service. METHODS: According to the standards of evaluating the quality of medical records in outpatient service, random sampling was made among 19 clinical departments of Xijing Hospital from July to October in the year of 2000. And the software SPLM was applied for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: 685 medical records out of the 730 ones were evaluated as the first rate (the score was no less than 85 points), with an average of 94.63. The well written medical records were written by senior doctors with higher professional titles, who were familiar with the rules of writing medical records and whose department set strict demands on them. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the quality of medical records in outpatient service, junior doctors and doctors here for further training should have specific training in writing medical records.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To evaluate the present situation of medical records in our outpatient service and to analyze the major factors influencing the quality of medical records in our outpatient service. METHODS: According to the standards of evaluating the quality of medical records in outpatient service, random sampling was made among 19 clinical departments of Xijing Hospital from July to October in the year of 2000. And the software SPLM was applied for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: 685 medical records out of the 730 ones were evaluated as the first rate (the score was no less than 85 points), with an average of 94.63. The well written medical records were written by senior doctors with higher professional titles, who were familiar with the rules of writing medical records and whose department set strict demands on them. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the quality of medical records in outpatient service, junior doctors and doctors here for further training should have specific training in writing medical records.

Key concepts: Medical record, Medicine, Service (business), Outpatient clinic, Quality (philosophy), Service quality, Statistical software, Medical emergency

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Statistical analysis of the quality of medical records in outpatient service — Research Paper | ScholarLens