2005Zhonghua putong waike zazhiRequires access

Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of solid malignant tumors with Cool- tip needle:report of 102 cases

Gao Shun-li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate ‘Cool-tip nee dl e’ radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of solid tumors. MethodsIn this study, 102 patients w ith 157 tumors underwent RFA. Tumor size varied from 1.0cm to 20.0cm in d iameter. Result The comple te ablation(CA) rate was 83.5%(91/109)in tumors less than 5cm in diameter , and 35.4%(17/48)when tumors were larger than 5cm. RFA significantl y ameliorates symptoms in most lung cancer patients, and in 40%(4/10)patient s of pancreatic tumors. In the group receiving percutaneous RFA , no patients we re shifted to celiotomy, nor skin burn, or pneumothorax occurred. RFA for hepa tic tumors was complicated with abdominal pain in 13.4%(11/82), nausea in 6 .1%(5/82), jaundice in 9.7%(8/82), fever in 23.2%(19/82), and biliary leak age in 1.2%(1/82). Post RFA complications for pulmonary tumors included pain in 14.3%(1/7)and hypodermal gas accumulation in 14.3%(1/7). For pancrea tic tumors, pancreatic leakage in developed 20%(2/10), elevated blood amylas e in 70%(7/10), GI bleeding in 20%(2/10). Con clusions Treating solid tumors with ‘Cool-tip needle ’ RFA is efficient, reliable and safe, but great care should be taken in case o f pancreatic tumors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate ‘Cool-tip nee dl e’ radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of solid tumors. MethodsIn this study, 102 patients w ith 157 tumors underwent RFA. Tumor size varied from 1.0cm to 20.0cm in d iameter. Result The comple te ablation(CA) rate was 83.5%(91/109)in tumors less than 5cm in diameter , and 35.4%(17/48)when tumors were larger than 5cm. RFA significantl y ameliorates symptoms in most lung cancer patients, and in 40%(4/10)patient s of pancreatic tumors. In the group receiving percutaneous RFA , no patients we re shifted to celiotomy, nor skin burn, or pneumothorax occurred. RFA for hepa tic tumors was complicated with abdominal pain in 13.4%(11/82), nausea in 6 .1%(5/82), jaundice in 9.7%(8/82), fever in 23.2%(19/82), and biliary leak age in 1.2%(1/82). Post RFA complications for pulmonary tumors included pain in 14.3%(1/7)and hypodermal gas accumulation in 14.3%(1/7). For pancrea tic tumors, pancreatic leakage in developed 20%(2/10), elevated blood amylas e in 70%(7/10), GI bleeding in 20%(2/10). Con clusions Treating solid tumors with ‘Cool-tip needle ’ RFA is efficient, reliable and safe, but great care should be taken in case o f pancreatic tumors.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate ‘Cool-tip nee dl e’ radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of solid tumors. MethodsIn this study, 102 patients w ith 157 tumors underwent RFA. Tumor size varied from 1.0cm to 20.0cm in d iameter. Result The comple te ablation(CA) rate was 83.5%(91/109)in tumors less than 5cm in diameter , and 35.4%(17/48)when tumors were larger than 5cm. RFA significantl y ameliorates symptoms in most lung cancer patients, and in 40%(4/10)patient s of pancreatic tumors. In the group receiving percutaneous RFA , no patients we re shifted to celiotomy, nor skin burn, or pneumothorax occurred. RFA for hepa tic tumors was complicated with abdominal pain in 13.4%(11/82), nausea in 6 .1%(5/82), jaundice in 9.7%(8/82), fever in 23.2%(19/82), and biliary leak age in 1.2%(1/82). Post RFA complications for pulmonary tumors included pain in 14.3%(1/7)and hypodermal gas accumulation in 14.3%(1/7). For pancrea tic tumors, pancreatic leakage in developed 20%(2/10), elevated blood amylas e in 70%(7/10), GI bleeding in 20%(2/10). Con clusions Treating solid tumors with ‘Cool-tip needle ’ RFA is efficient, reliable and safe, but great care should be taken in case o f pancreatic tumors.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiofrequency ablation, Pneumothorax, Percutaneous, Ablation, Nausea, Pancreatic cancer, Jaundice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of solid malignant tumors with Cool- tip needle:report of 102 cases — Research Paper | ScholarLens