2008China Foreign Medical TreatmentRequires access

Clinical Study of Combined Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Ultra-acute Cerebral Infarction

LI Nai-xuan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis for ultra- acute cerebral infarction.Methods 81 patients with acute ischemic stroke of within 6 hours after onset were randomly assigned into two groups, groupⅠ including 46 patients with combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis and group Ⅱ 35 patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis alone.In groupⅠ,10 000U/kg urokinase were intravenously administered following 5000U/kg urokinase given intra-arterially.While in groupⅡ,10 000/kg urokinase were given intra-arterially alone.The European Stroke Scale (ESS) and Bethel index (BI) were used to evaluate the recovery of neurological deficit function and efficacy and adverse event were observed for all patients in different period.Results ESS scores were 83±24,88±26at 24 hours and 3 days after treatment respectively in groupⅠ,and 77±29,81±24 in groupⅡ2, the BI scores were 71.5±25.9,82.5±27.4 at 3days and 30days after thrombolysis respectively groupⅠ,and 61.5±22.3,72.0±31.6 in groupⅡ,There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.005).The total efficacy rate of groupⅠ86.7% was significantly higher than that of groupⅡ 77.1%,there were 3 patients in group Ⅰ and 2 patients in group Ⅱ with CT hemorrhage after thrombolysis. Conclusion Within 6 hours from onset, combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute cerebral infarction is more effective than and that of intra-arterial thrombolysis alone. The safety is similar between them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis for ultra- acute cerebral infarction.Methods 81 patients with acute ischemic stroke of within 6 hours after onset were randomly assigned into two groups, groupⅠ including 46 patients with combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis and group Ⅱ 35 patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis alone.In groupⅠ,10 000U/kg urokinase were intravenously administered following 5000U/kg urokinase given intra-arterially.While in groupⅡ,10 000/kg urokinase were given intra-arterially alone.The European Stroke Scale (ESS) and Bethel index (BI) were used to evaluate the recovery of neurological deficit function and efficacy and adverse event were observed for all patients in different period.Results ESS scores were 83±24,88±26at 24 hours and 3 days after treatment respectively in groupⅠ,and 77±29,81±24 in groupⅡ2, the BI scores were 71.5±25.9,82.5±27.4 at 3days and 30days after thrombolysis respectively groupⅠ,and 61.5±22.3,72.0±31.6 in groupⅡ,There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.005).The total efficacy rate of groupⅠ86.7% was significantly higher than that of groupⅡ 77.1%,there were 3 patients in group Ⅰ and 2 patients in group Ⅱ with CT hemorrhage after thrombolysis. Conclusion Within 6 hours from onset, combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute cerebral infarction is more effective than and that of intra-arterial thrombolysis alone. The safety is similar between them.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis for ultra- acute cerebral infarction.Methods 81 patients with acute ischemic stroke of within 6 hours after onset were randomly assigned into two groups, groupⅠ including 46 patients with combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis and group Ⅱ 35 patients with intra-arterial thrombolysis alone.In groupⅠ,10 000U/kg urokinase were intravenously administered following 5000U/kg urokinase given intra-arterially.While in groupⅡ,10 000/kg urokinase were given intra-arterially alone.The European Stroke Scale (ESS) and Bethel index (BI) were used to evaluate the recovery of neurological deficit function and efficacy and adverse event were observed for all patients in different period.Results ESS scores were 83±24,88±26at 24 hours and 3 days after treatment respectively in groupⅠ,and 77±29,81±24 in groupⅡ2, the BI scores were 71.5±25.9,82.5±27.4 at 3days and 30days after thrombolysis respectively groupⅠ,and 61.5±22.3,72.0±31.6 in groupⅡ,There was significant difference between the two groups(P0.005).The total efficacy rate of groupⅠ86.7% was significantly higher than that of groupⅡ 77.1%,there were 3 patients in group Ⅰ and 2 patients in group Ⅱ with CT hemorrhage after thrombolysis. Conclusion Within 6 hours from onset, combined intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute cerebral infarction is more effective than and that of intra-arterial thrombolysis alone. The safety is similar between them.

Key concepts: Medicine, Thrombolysis, Urokinase, Anesthesia, Cerebral infarction, Adverse effect, Internal medicine, Ischemia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Study of Combined Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Ultra-acute Cerebral Infarction — Research Paper | ScholarLens