Comparison of the Tracheal and Intravenous Lidocaine on Preventing Cardiovascular Response in the Children with General Anesthesia and Tracheal Intubation
Hao Fang
Abstract
Hao Fang
Abstract
Objective:To compare the clinical effects of the tracheal and intravenous lidocaine on preventing cardiovascular response in the children with general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.Methods:Fourty-five children of 1 to 12 years old were randomly allocated into tracheal group (Group T),venous group (Group V) and contral group(Group P).Induction of anesthesia was commenced by intravenous administration of propofol 3 mg/kg,fentanyl 2μg/kg and vecuronium 1.5 mg/kg.Patients of group T were given lidocaine aerosol by trachea and patients of group V were given lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg i.v before intubation 1.5 min.Change in heart rate (HR),systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before induction of anesthesia,immediately intubation and at 1,3 and 5 min after intubation in all children.Results:There was no significant differences between 3 groups at immediately intubation with the exception of ascending HR,SBP,MAP in Group P(P0.05).Compared with other groups,SBP in Group V even decreased (P0.05).SBP and MAP in Group V were obviously lower than those of other groups(P0.05).The blood press in Group T decreased remarkably at 1 min after intubution compared with the baseline (P0.05).There were no significant difference in 3 groups at 3 min and 5 min after intubution.Conclusion:Both tracheal lidocaine aerosol and intravenous lidocaine can effectively prevent the cardiovascular response caused by tracheal intubation.Intravenous lidocaine can apply more stable hemodynamic status during endotracheal intubation.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective:To compare the clinical effects of the tracheal and intravenous lidocaine on preventing cardiovascular response in the children with general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.Methods:Fourty-five children of 1 to 12 years old were randomly allocated into tracheal group (Group T),venous group (Group V) and contral group(Group P).Induction of anesthesia was commenced by intravenous administration of propofol 3 mg/kg,fentanyl 2μg/kg and vecuronium 1.5 mg/kg.Patients of group T were given lidocaine aerosol by trachea and patients of group V were given lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg i.v before intubation 1.5 min.Change in heart rate (HR),systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before induction of anesthesia,immediately intubation and at 1,3 and 5 min after intubation in all children.Results:There was no significant differences between 3 groups at immediately intubation with the exception of ascending HR,SBP,MAP in Group P(P0.05).Compared with other groups,SBP in Group V even decreased (P0.05).SBP and MAP in Group V were obviously lower than those of other groups(P0.05).The blood press in Group T decreased remarkably at 1 min after intubution compared with the baseline (P0.05).There were no significant difference in 3 groups at 3 min and 5 min after intubution.Conclusion:Both tracheal lidocaine aerosol and intravenous lidocaine can effectively prevent the cardiovascular response caused by tracheal intubation.Intravenous lidocaine can apply more stable hemodynamic status during endotracheal intubation.
Key concepts: Medicine, Lidocaine, Anesthesia, Intubation, Tracheal intubation, Fentanyl, Propofol, Blood pressure