2009Zhongguo linchuang yixueRequires access

Comparison of the Tracheal and Intravenous Lidocaine on Preventing Cardiovascular Response in the Children with General Anesthesia and Tracheal Intubation

Hao Fang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of the tracheal and intravenous lidocaine on preventing cardiovascular response in the children with general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.Methods:Fourty-five children of 1 to 12 years old were randomly allocated into tracheal group (Group T),venous group (Group V) and contral group(Group P).Induction of anesthesia was commenced by intravenous administration of propofol 3 mg/kg,fentanyl 2μg/kg and vecuronium 1.5 mg/kg.Patients of group T were given lidocaine aerosol by trachea and patients of group V were given lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg i.v before intubation 1.5 min.Change in heart rate (HR),systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before induction of anesthesia,immediately intubation and at 1,3 and 5 min after intubation in all children.Results:There was no significant differences between 3 groups at immediately intubation with the exception of ascending HR,SBP,MAP in Group P(P0.05).Compared with other groups,SBP in Group V even decreased (P0.05).SBP and MAP in Group V were obviously lower than those of other groups(P0.05).The blood press in Group T decreased remarkably at 1 min after intubution compared with the baseline (P0.05).There were no significant difference in 3 groups at 3 min and 5 min after intubution.Conclusion:Both tracheal lidocaine aerosol and intravenous lidocaine can effectively prevent the cardiovascular response caused by tracheal intubation.Intravenous lidocaine can apply more stable hemodynamic status during endotracheal intubation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of the tracheal and intravenous lidocaine on preventing cardiovascular response in the children with general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.Methods:Fourty-five children of 1 to 12 years old were randomly allocated into tracheal group (Group T),venous group (Group V) and contral group(Group P).Induction of anesthesia was commenced by intravenous administration of propofol 3 mg/kg,fentanyl 2μg/kg and vecuronium 1.5 mg/kg.Patients of group T were given lidocaine aerosol by trachea and patients of group V were given lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg i.v before intubation 1.5 min.Change in heart rate (HR),systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before induction of anesthesia,immediately intubation and at 1,3 and 5 min after intubation in all children.Results:There was no significant differences between 3 groups at immediately intubation with the exception of ascending HR,SBP,MAP in Group P(P0.05).Compared with other groups,SBP in Group V even decreased (P0.05).SBP and MAP in Group V were obviously lower than those of other groups(P0.05).The blood press in Group T decreased remarkably at 1 min after intubution compared with the baseline (P0.05).There were no significant difference in 3 groups at 3 min and 5 min after intubution.Conclusion:Both tracheal lidocaine aerosol and intravenous lidocaine can effectively prevent the cardiovascular response caused by tracheal intubation.Intravenous lidocaine can apply more stable hemodynamic status during endotracheal intubation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of the tracheal and intravenous lidocaine on preventing cardiovascular response in the children with general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.Methods:Fourty-five children of 1 to 12 years old were randomly allocated into tracheal group (Group T),venous group (Group V) and contral group(Group P).Induction of anesthesia was commenced by intravenous administration of propofol 3 mg/kg,fentanyl 2μg/kg and vecuronium 1.5 mg/kg.Patients of group T were given lidocaine aerosol by trachea and patients of group V were given lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg i.v before intubation 1.5 min.Change in heart rate (HR),systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded before induction of anesthesia,immediately intubation and at 1,3 and 5 min after intubation in all children.Results:There was no significant differences between 3 groups at immediately intubation with the exception of ascending HR,SBP,MAP in Group P(P0.05).Compared with other groups,SBP in Group V even decreased (P0.05).SBP and MAP in Group V were obviously lower than those of other groups(P0.05).The blood press in Group T decreased remarkably at 1 min after intubution compared with the baseline (P0.05).There were no significant difference in 3 groups at 3 min and 5 min after intubution.Conclusion:Both tracheal lidocaine aerosol and intravenous lidocaine can effectively prevent the cardiovascular response caused by tracheal intubation.Intravenous lidocaine can apply more stable hemodynamic status during endotracheal intubation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Lidocaine, Anesthesia, Intubation, Tracheal intubation, Fentanyl, Propofol, Blood pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Tracheal and Intravenous Lidocaine on Preventing Cardiovascular Response in the Children with General Anesthesia and Tracheal Intubation — Research Paper | ScholarLens