2007Journal of Hengyang Normal UniversityRequires access

Why and How Contract could be possible: Consideration from the Perspective of Rawls and Buchanan

Dong Shan-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The classic contract explained why and how contract could be possible through a preoccupation with state of nature.Contrast to it,Rawls insists that state of nature couldnt guarantee a undistracted contract.Then,his hypothesis is preoccupied with original position,and admits some people to make any fundamental principle,in the case of this condition,the contract chosen by some relevant participant must be justice.James M.Buchanon,while,who immediately appeals to take account of people's strategy behavior and games by no means of any hypothesis.He claims that people's mutual benefited contract would be constructed so far as participants have made certain of property right and acknowledged their equal status of otherness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The classic contract explained why and how contract could be possible through a preoccupation with state of nature.Contrast to it,Rawls insists that state of nature couldnt guarantee a undistracted contract.Then,his hypothesis is preoccupied with original position,and admits some people to make any fundamental principle,in the case of this condition,the contract chosen by some relevant participant must be justice.James M.Buchanon,while,who immediately appeals to take account of people's strategy behavior and games by no means of any hypothesis.He claims that people's mutual benefited contract would be constructed so far as participants have made certain of property right and acknowledged their equal status of otherness.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The classic contract explained why and how contract could be possible through a preoccupation with state of nature.Contrast to it,Rawls insists that state of nature couldnt guarantee a undistracted contract.Then,his hypothesis is preoccupied with original position,and admits some people to make any fundamental principle,in the case of this condition,the contract chosen by some relevant participant must be justice.James M.Buchanon,while,who immediately appeals to take account of people's strategy behavior and games by no means of any hypothesis.He claims that people's mutual benefited contract would be constructed so far as participants have made certain of property right and acknowledged their equal status of otherness.

Key concepts: Property (philosophy), Perspective (graphical), Original position, Economic Justice, State (computer science), Law and economics, Position (finance), Severability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Why and How Contract could be possible: Consideration from the Perspective of Rawls and Buchanan — Research Paper | ScholarLens