2007The Journal of Spinal SurgeryRequires access

Indication option of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty

Wenwen Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the best indication of nucleoplasty in treating cervical disc herniation. Methods A total of 127 symptomatic patients (81males and 46 females, mean age 49 years) were treated with nucleoplasty by one surgeon. An average percentage of symptom relief (VAS score) and subjective satisfaction rate were used to evaluate results at follow-up. Results Patients were followed up for average 18 months(range 4~31 months)postoperatively. The excellent rate of subjective satisfaction was 74% in the patients with axial pain and/or radicular pain, The excellent rate of subjective satisfaction was 76% in the patients with small and lateral disc herniation on MRI. Conclusion The results showed that the nucleoplasty should be performed only for the patients with cervical disc herniation characteristically by: ① Ssevere axial pain and reflecting radicular pain; ② Small and lateral disc herniation on MRI; ③ Supplementary therapy perioperatively in patients treated with cervical open surgery.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the best indication of nucleoplasty in treating cervical disc herniation. Methods A total of 127 symptomatic patients (81males and 46 females, mean age 49 years) were treated with nucleoplasty by one surgeon. An average percentage of symptom relief (VAS score) and subjective satisfaction rate were used to evaluate results at follow-up. Results Patients were followed up for average 18 months(range 4~31 months)postoperatively. The excellent rate of subjective satisfaction was 74% in the patients with axial pain and/or radicular pain, The excellent rate of subjective satisfaction was 76% in the patients with small and lateral disc herniation on MRI. Conclusion The results showed that the nucleoplasty should be performed only for the patients with cervical disc herniation characteristically by: ① Ssevere axial pain and reflecting radicular pain; ② Small and lateral disc herniation on MRI; ③ Supplementary therapy perioperatively in patients treated with cervical open surgery.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the best indication of nucleoplasty in treating cervical disc herniation. Methods A total of 127 symptomatic patients (81males and 46 females, mean age 49 years) were treated with nucleoplasty by one surgeon. An average percentage of symptom relief (VAS score) and subjective satisfaction rate were used to evaluate results at follow-up. Results Patients were followed up for average 18 months(range 4~31 months)postoperatively. The excellent rate of subjective satisfaction was 74% in the patients with axial pain and/or radicular pain, The excellent rate of subjective satisfaction was 76% in the patients with small and lateral disc herniation on MRI. Conclusion The results showed that the nucleoplasty should be performed only for the patients with cervical disc herniation characteristically by: ① Ssevere axial pain and reflecting radicular pain; ② Small and lateral disc herniation on MRI; ③ Supplementary therapy perioperatively in patients treated with cervical open surgery.

Key concepts: Medicine, Disc herniation, Percutaneous, Radicular pain, Cervical radiculopathy, Surgery, Patient satisfaction, Back pain

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Indication option of percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens