2014Journal of Southwest China Normal UniversityRequires access

Real Options in Project Investment Decision-Making-Problems and Optimization

Li L

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Optionsin investment decision-making evaluation of oil projects has some limitations. ROaR(Real Options at Risk)model can overcome the defect of Real Options,which gives a fixed value to the parameters,and thus can clearly depict the project option value under different risk profiles.When ROaR is used for investment evaluation,however,if a very poor risk or extreme risk occurs in investment operation,the project will cost more than expected.Consequently,the evaluation results may turn out to be opposite to the practical situation and cause the failure of the project investment-a decision-making paradox.In the present study,utility theory of project decision-making is used to build the optimization method for controlling the losses of Real Options and the optimization evaluation model for controlling the project baseline,which can effectively control the risk within the scope of the set.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Optionsin investment decision-making evaluation of oil projects has some limitations. ROaR(Real Options at Risk)model can overcome the defect of Real Options,which gives a fixed value to the parameters,and thus can clearly depict the project option value under different risk profiles.When ROaR is used for investment evaluation,however,if a very poor risk or extreme risk occurs in investment operation,the project will cost more than expected.Consequently,the evaluation results may turn out to be opposite to the practical situation and cause the failure of the project investment-a decision-making paradox.In the present study,utility theory of project decision-making is used to build the optimization method for controlling the losses of Real Options and the optimization evaluation model for controlling the project baseline,which can effectively control the risk within the scope of the set.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Optionsin investment decision-making evaluation of oil projects has some limitations. ROaR(Real Options at Risk)model can overcome the defect of Real Options,which gives a fixed value to the parameters,and thus can clearly depict the project option value under different risk profiles.When ROaR is used for investment evaluation,however,if a very poor risk or extreme risk occurs in investment operation,the project will cost more than expected.Consequently,the evaluation results may turn out to be opposite to the practical situation and cause the failure of the project investment-a decision-making paradox.In the present study,utility theory of project decision-making is used to build the optimization method for controlling the losses of Real Options and the optimization evaluation model for controlling the project baseline,which can effectively control the risk within the scope of the set.

Key concepts: Scope (computer science), Risk analysis (engineering), Investment (military), Set (abstract data type), Investment decisions, Expected utility hypothesis, Computer science, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Real Options in Project Investment Decision-Making-Problems and Optimization — Research Paper | ScholarLens