2010•Fazhi yu shehui fazhanRequires access

On the Concept of "Applied Legal Philosophy" in Contemporary China

Cai Hong-wei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It can be suggested that making use of legal science and legal philosophy both of which are clearly-defined categories discusses problems in order to try to clarify the mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy through semantic analysis. Legal science indicates the thinking activities which research into the universal rules and interpretations of legal phenomena. General legal science and particular legal science can be differentiated as the inferior concepts of legal science. Legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought itself. Both legal science and legal philosophy explore the fundamental problem of what is law. Applied legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought in particular field. The mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy is based on two false premises,that is,confusing knowledge fruits and thinking activities on the one hand,the natural rationality of subject division on the other hand.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It can be suggested that making use of legal science and legal philosophy both of which are clearly-defined categories discusses problems in order to try to clarify the mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy through semantic analysis. Legal science indicates the thinking activities which research into the universal rules and interpretations of legal phenomena. General legal science and particular legal science can be differentiated as the inferior concepts of legal science. Legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought itself. Both legal science and legal philosophy explore the fundamental problem of what is law. Applied legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought in particular field. The mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy is based on two false premises,that is,confusing knowledge fruits and thinking activities on the one hand,the natural rationality of subject division on the other hand.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It can be suggested that making use of legal science and legal philosophy both of which are clearly-defined categories discusses problems in order to try to clarify the mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy through semantic analysis. Legal science indicates the thinking activities which research into the universal rules and interpretations of legal phenomena. General legal science and particular legal science can be differentiated as the inferior concepts of legal science. Legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought itself. Both legal science and legal philosophy explore the fundamental problem of what is law. Applied legal philosophy indicates the activities of reflection and criticism targeted to legal thought in particular field. The mess about the concept of applied legal philosophy is based on two false premises,that is,confusing knowledge fruits and thinking activities on the one hand,the natural rationality of subject division on the other hand.

Key concepts: Philosophy of law, Empirical legal studies, Legal realism, Legal profession, Legal science, Epistemology, Legal research, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Concept of "Applied Legal Philosophy" in Contemporary China — Research Paper | ScholarLens